Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33195171›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Using Genetic Code Expansion for Protein Biochemical Studies.

Christina Z Chung, Kazuaki Amikura, Dieter Söll

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Expanding the Genetic Code ofACS chemical biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Single-Molecule FRET Analyses of NMDA Receptors.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. "Not-so-popular" orthogonal pairs in genetic code expansion.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Review
  15. Chemically Acylated tRNAs are Functional in Zebrafish Embryos.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christina Z ChungDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Kazuaki AmikuraDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Dieter SöllDepartment of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.

Funding

Studies of Transfer RNAR35GM122560 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SOLL, DIETER · 2017 to 2022
$5.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein identification has gone beyond simply using protein/peptide tags and labeling canonical amino acids. Genetic code expansion has allowed residue- or site-specific incorporation of non-canonical amino acids into proteins. By taking advantage of the unique properties of non-canonical amino acids, we can identify spatiotemporal-specific protein states within living cells. Insertion of more than one non-canonical amino acid allows for selective labeling that can aid in the identification of weak or transient protein-protein interactions. This review will discuss recent studies applying genetic code expansion for protein labeling and identifying protein-protein interactions and offer considerations for future work in expanding genetic code expansion methods.

Indexed as

genetic code expansionnon-canonical amino acidsprotein labelingprotein–protein interactionsprotein purification

Identifiers

PMID33195171
PMCPMC7604363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.