Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33195144›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

Modifying and Integrating

Aylin Cidem, Peta Bradbury, Daniela Traini, Hui Xin Ong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. In vitro approaches to assess respiratory toxicity from volatile organic compounds: an in-depth review.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recreating chronic respiratory infectionsEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Basic Science Perspective on Engineering and Modeling the Large Airways.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  18. A multiplex inhalation platform to modelFrontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  19. Lung Organoids for Hazard Assessment of Nanomaterials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aylin CidemRespiratory Technology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Peta BradburyRespiratory Technology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Daniela TrainiRespiratory Technology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hui Xin OngRespiratory Technology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the past 50 years, the route of inhalation has been utilized to administer therapies to treat a variety of respiratory and pulmonary diseases. When compared with other drug administration routes, inhalation offers a targeted, non-invasive approach to deliver rapid onset of drug action to the lung, minimizing systemic drug exposure and subsequent side effects. However, despite advances in inhaled therapies, there is still a need to improve the preclinical screening and the efficacy of inhaled therapeutics. Innovative

Indexed as

drug deliverydrug efficacydrug toxicityinhalation therapyisolated perfused lunglung-on-chiporganoidprecision-cut lung slices

Identifiers

PMID33195144
PMCPMC7644812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.