Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33195078›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2020

Accuracy Meets Interpretability for Computational Spectroscopy by Means of Hybrid and Double-Hybrid Functionals.

Vincenzo Barone, Giorgia Ceselin, Marco Fusè, Nicola Tasinato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gas-Phase Reactions of HACS earth & space chemistry · 2025
    Article
  7. The Radiative Efficiency and Global Warming Potential of HCFC-132b.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CCSD(T) Rotational Constants for Highly Challenging CMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vincenzo BaroneSMART Laboratory, Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giorgia CeselinSMART Laboratory, Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Marco FusèSMART Laboratory, Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Nicola TasinatoSMART Laboratory, Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accuracy and interpretability are often seen as the devil and holy grail in computational spectroscopy and their reconciliation remains a primary research goal. In the last few decades, density functional theory has revolutionized the situation, paving the way to reliable yet effective models for medium size molecules, which could also be profitably used by non-specialists. In this contribution we will compare the results of some widely used hybrid and double hybrid functionals with the aim of defining the most suitable recipe for all the spectroscopic parameters of interest in rotational and vibrational spectroscopy, going beyond the rigid rotor/harmonic oscillator model. We will show that last-generation hybrid and double hybrid functionals in conjunction with partially augmented double- and triple-zeta basis sets can offer, in the framework of second order vibrational perturbation theory, a general, robust, and user-friendly tool with unprecedented accuracy for medium-size semi-rigid molecules.

Indexed as

astrochemical moleculesatmospheric moleculesbenchmarkdensity functional theoryquantum chemistryrotational spectroscopyvibrational spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID33195078
PMCPMC7645164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.