ReviewDrugs1987
Cephalosporins in surgery. Prophylaxis and therapy.
Review in Drugs, 1987. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential effects of different delivery methods on progression to severe postpartum hemorrhage between Chinese nulliparous and multiparous women: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- Trends in orthopaedic antimicrobial prophylaxis in the UK between 2005 and 2011.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2013Article
- Review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use of cephalosporins.Texas Heart Institute journal · 1990Article
- Microbiological investigation of cephalosporins.Drugs · 1987Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prophylactic antibiotics in surgery are intended to prevent morbidity and mortality, as well as to reduce the duration and cost of hospitalisation. The indications for prophylaxis, and its effectiveness, should be evaluated with these criteria in mind. The basis for antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery is either provision of an effective concentration of antibiotic in the tissue site at the time of potential contamination, or (primarily in the case of colorectal surgery) to reduce the inoculum of potentially contaminating bacteria. Cephalosporins are the antibiotics most widely used for prophylaxis in surgery, and have clearly been shown to reduce postoperative morbidity in vaginal hysterectomy, resection of head and neck cancers, vascular grafting, total joint replacement, repair of hip fractures, and high risk gastroduodenal surgery. They are probably also useful in cardiac surgery, abdominal hysterectomy, caesarean section, and colorectal surgery. For orthopaedic, cardiac, gynaecological, and gastroduodenal procedures it is important to select an antibiotic with proven clinical activity against Gram-positive organisms. For head and neck surgery, the spectrum of activity should also include oral anaerobes and Enterobacteriaceae. For biliary surgery an antibiotic effective against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms may offer at least theoretical advantages, while for appendicectomy a cephamycin represents the most appropriate choice. In colorectal procedures, activity against B. fragilis is the major consideration in selecting an antibiotic for systemic prophylaxis. When intra-abdominal sepsis occurs following surgery, a potentially wide range of bacteria may be implicated, but in practice such infections are due to a small number of species, with B. fragilis most commonly implicated. The most useful cephalosporins in this setting are those active against both aerobic Gram-negative bacteria and anaerobes, especially B. fragilis. In practice, an aminoglycoside is often administered concomitantly. Importantly, prompt surgical treatment is the cornerstone of management of abdominal sepsis, and empirical antibiotic therapy should be adjusted as needed when culture and sensitivity tests become available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
3319503What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.