Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3319500›Full record

ReviewDrugs1987

Role of cephalosporins in gonorrhoea and other sexually transmitted diseases.

I Phillips

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1987. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Cephalosporin-probenecid drug interactions.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 1993
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

I PhillipsDepartment of Microbiology, United Medical School of Guy's Hospital, St. Thomas' Hospital, London.
St. Thomas Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cephalosporins have a role in the treatment of gonorrhoea, and especially infections caused by strains that are penicillin-resistant, either because they produce plasmid-mediated beta-lactamase or they have chromosomally mediated diminished permeability or modified penicillin-binding proteins. Although none of the oral or Group I agents are useful, most of the Group II, III and IV agents are, and especially cefuroxime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and cefoxitin. In addition to uncomplicated urethral, cervical or rectal infections, appropriate regimens are also effective for the treatment of pharyngeal infections, disseminated infections and gonococcal ophthalmia. The cephalosporins have no clear role in the treatment of syphilis, granuloma inguinale, Mycoplasma or chlamydial infections or bacterial vaginosis, but ceftriaxone may be effective in chancroid, and cefoxitin in combination with an antichlamydial agent (such as a tetracycline) might be used for the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease.

Indexed as

CephalosporinsGonorrheaHumansSexually Transmitted DiseasesCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID3319500
OpenAlexW2014532223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.