Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3319496›Full record

ReviewDrugs1987

Cephalosporins in gram-positive infections.

J Symonds, A M Geddes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1987. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Treatment of Actinomyces europaeus and Clostridium innocuum necrotizing fasciitis: Case report and literature review.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J SymondsUniversity of Birmingham.
A M Geddes
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria are an important and common cause of morbidity and mortality. Staphylococci and streptococci are the most frequent infecting organisms in skin and soft tissue infections, pneumonia, bone and joint infections, and endocarditis. Anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria such as Clostridia spp. cause infections that can rapidly produce tissue necrosis and death. The cephalosporins are indicated for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria in certain circumstances. These include selected patients with endocarditis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis and cellulitis. They are also used as alternatives to the penicillins in penicillin-allergic patients and for 'mixed' infections caused by Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. This article discusses the indications for the cephalosporin group of antibiotics in patients suffering from infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial InfectionsCephalosporinsGram-Positive BacteriaHumansCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID3319496
OpenAlexW2018554107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.