ReviewFrontiers in public health2020
Economic Analysis of the European Healthcare Burden of Sternal-Wound Infections Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The TCRAT Technique (Total Coronary Revascularization via Left Anterior Thoracotomy): Renaissance in Minimally Invasive On-Pump Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- The Prevention of Sternal Wound Infection After Median Sternotomy Is Very Important.International wound journal · 2025Article
- Risk factors for sternal wound infection after median sternotomy: A nested case-control study and time-to-event analysis.International wound journal · 2024Article
- The impact of two radical sternectomy surgical techniques on the outcome of deep sternal wound infections.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Sternal Wound Infection: A Surgeon's Nemesis.Annals of cardiac anaesthesia · 2024Article
- Cost Analysis of Robot-Assisted Versus On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Single-Center Surgical and 30-Day Outcomes Comparison.Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.