Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3319494›Full record

ReviewDrugs1987

Cephalosporins 1945-1986.

E P Abraham

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1987. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. β-Lactams and β-Lactamase Inhibitors: An Overview.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2016
    Review
  9. Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with ceftriaxone, a review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2012
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

E P AbrahamSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1945, after penicillin had been introduced into medicine, an antibiotic-producing species of Cephalosporium was isolated from a sewage outfall in Sardinia. Four years later in Oxford, this organism was found to produce several antibiotics, one of which was a penicillin with a new side-chain, penicillin N. During a chemical study in 1953, this penicillin was shown to be contaminated with a second substance, cephalosporin C, which contained a beta-lactam ring but was resistant to hydrolysis by a penicillinase (beta-lactamase). At that time, penicillinase-producing Staphylococci were causing a serious problem in hospitals. The isolation of the nucleus of cephalosporin C (7-ACA) enabled pharmaceutical manufacturers to produce many thousands of cephalosporins, some of which have been effective in the treatment of serious infections by a number of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The cephalosporins, like the newer penicillins, have a very low toxicity and have greatly extended the range of chemotherapy. New, sensitive screening methods have revealed further families of clinically useful substances that contain a reactive beta-lactam ring. Genetic engineering has now begun to throw light on the nature of the enzymes that are involved in the biosynthesis of penicillins and cephalosporins, and x-ray crystallography may soon provide detailed 3-dimensional pictures of some of the bacterial enzymes with which the active beta-lactam ring reacts. Rational approaches to the production and design of new and potentially useful compounds may then be within sight.

Indexed as

CephalosporinsHistory, 20th CenturyCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID3319494
OpenAlexW2163015606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.