Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33194817›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2020

Multiomics Study of Gut Bacteria and Host Metabolism in Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Depression Patients.

Congmin Xu, Qiong Jia, Lu Zhang, Zhe Wang, Shiwei Zhu, Xiaoqi Wang, Yixuan Liu, Mo Li, Jingjing Zhang, Xiangqun Wang and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Gut Bacteria Improve Depressive Symptoms by Degrading Cortisol into Androgen.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The ProbioticFrontiers in nutrition · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Congmin XuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, and Center for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Qiong JiaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lu ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhe WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, and Center for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Shiwei ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaoqi WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, and Center for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yixuan LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Mo LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, and Center for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jingjing ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiangqun WangDepartment of Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jindong ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qinghua SunDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Kun WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huaiqiu ZhuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, and Center for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Liping DuanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNPeking University Sixth Hospital · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and depression have high tendencies of comorbidity. In particular, diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) and depression exhibit similar fecal microbiota signatures, yet little is known about their pathogenic mechanism. Here, we propose that the differences in structure and composition of IBS-D and depression gut microbiota give rise to different downstream functions, which lead to distinct clinical phenotypes Methods: We performed multiomics study, including fecal metagenome-wide sequencing and serum metabolomics profiling in 65 individuals with IBS-D (n=22), depression (n=15), comorbid patients (n=13), and healthy controls (n=15). We analyzed functional genes contributed by the primary genus and evaluated their correlations with clinical indices and host metabolites. Results: Metagenomic analysis revealed 26 clusters of orthologous groups of protein (COG) categories consisting of a total of 4,631 functional genes. Trehalose and maltose hydrolase (COG1554) and fucose permease (COG0738) were the most relevant and enriched functional genes in the IBS-D patients; urease accessory proteins UreE (COG2371) was that in the depression patients. Context based genome annotation suggest that an alteration of Conclusions: These changes led us to propose a connection between genomic signatures and clinical differences observed in IBS-D and depression. Our findings provide further insights into the involvement of gut microbiota in diseases related to brain-gut disorder.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeIrritable Bowel SyndromeBacteriaDepressionFecesHumansE. cloacaeE. colifucose permeasetrehalose and maltose hydrolaseUre

Identifiers

PMID33194817
PMCPMC7658686
OpenAlexW3096361672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.