ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2020
Impact of Total Laboratory Automation on Turnaround Times for Urine Cultures and Screening Specimens for MRSA, ESBL, and VRE Carriage: Retrospective Comparison With Manual Workflow.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decolonization in Nursing Homes to Prevent Infection and Hospitalization.The New England journal of medicine · 2023Trial
- Quantification of time delay between screening and subsequent initiation of contact isolation for carriers of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the R-GNOSIS WP5 Trial.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023Trial
- Epidemiological and Molecular Surveillance of Multiresistant Citrobacter freundii Complex in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Impact of Total Laboratory Automation on Urine Culture Turnaround Time: A Comparative Study Between Manual Workflow and WASPLab™.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evolving microbiology laboratories: mastering automated culture-based processes and molecular assays, an institutional experience.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Still counting sperm? Why novel, truly informative measurements of testis function in male infertility are urgently needed.Endocrine · 2025Review
- The Impact of Laboratory Automation on the Time to Urine Microbiological Results: A Five-Year Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Development and evaluation of an artificial intelligence for bacterial growth monitoring in clinical bacteriology.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- Conversion of a classical microbiology laboratory to a total automation laboratory enhanced by the application of lean principles.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Evaluation of PhenoMATRIX and PhenoMATRIX PLUS for the screening of MRSA from nasal and inguinal/perineal swabs using chromogenic media.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- Application of machine learning based genome sequence analysis in pathogen identification.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Rapid and automated screening of carbapenemase- and ESBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria from rectal swabs using chromogenic agar media and the ScanStation device.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Laboratory Automation in Microbiology: Impact on Turnaround Time of Microbiological Samples in COVID Time.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Total Laboratory Automation for Rapid Detection and Identification of Microorganisms and Their Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Review
- Performance of Fully Automated Antimicrobial Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing Using Copan WASP Colibri Coupled to the Radian In-Line Carousel and Expert System.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using computerized time-stamps, we compared the turnaround-times (TAT) for urine samples and screening ESwabs of MRSA, VRE, and ESBL carriage in the bacteriology laboratory of Geneva University Hospitals between January and December 2017 (period preceding the implementation of the WASPLab
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.