Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33194771›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2020

Adoptive Cell Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Current Perspective of Next-Generation Medicine.

Jesús Fuentes-Antrás, Kissy Guevara-Hoyer, Mariona Baliu-Piqué, José Ángel García-Sáenz, Pedro Pérez-Segura, Atanasio Pandiella, Alberto Ocaña

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. ACS nano · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Shifting cold to hot tumors by nanoparticle-loaded drugs and products.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Breast cancer immunotherapy: a comprehensive review.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jesús Fuentes-AntrásBreast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Kissy Guevara-HoyerClinical Immunology Department, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Mariona Baliu-PiquéExperimental Therapeutics and Translational Oncology Unit, Medical Oncology Department, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
José Ángel García-SáenzBreast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Pedro Pérez-SeguraBreast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Atanasio PandiellaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology of Cancer and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Salamanca, Spain.
Alberto OcañaBreast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has become a cornerstone in the treatment of cancer and changed the way clinicians and researchers approach tumor vulnerabilities. Durable responses are commonly observed with immune checkpoint inhibitors in highly immunogenic tumors, while the infusion of T cells genetically engineered to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) has shown impressive efficacy in certain types of blood cancer. Nevertheless, harnessing our own immunity has not proved successful for most breast cancer patients. In the era of genomic medicine, cellular immunotherapies may provide a more personalized and dynamic tool against tumors displaying heterogeneous mutational landscapes and antigenic pools. This approach encompasses multiple strategies including the adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, dendritic cells, natural killer cells, and engineered immune components such as CAR constructs and engineered T cell receptors. Although far from permeating the clinical setting, technical advances have been overwhelming in recent years, with continuous improvement in traditional challenges such as toxicity, adoptive cell persistence, and intratumoral trafficking. Also, there is an avid search for neoantigens that can be targeted by these strategies, either alone or in combination. In this work, we aim to provide a clinically-oriented overview of preclinical and clinical data regarding the use of cellular immunotherapies in breast cancer.

Indexed as

adoptive cell therapybreast cancerCARdendritic cellnatural killer cellTCRTILtumor antigen

Identifiers

PMID33194771
PMCPMC7653090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.