ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020
Multi-Lineage
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dasatinib-based 2-step induction for adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Blood advances · 2022Trial
- [Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of Ph(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia with multilineage involvement].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Review
- Unraveling the Genetic Heterogeneity of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Based on NGS Applications.Cancers · 2024Review
- Rational Approach to New Chemical Entities with Antiproliferative Activity on Ab1 Tyrosine Kinase Encoded by thePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Multilineage involvement in KMT2A-rearranged B acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: cell-of-origin, biology, and clinical implications.Histopathology · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
- The Relevance of Aurora Kinase Inhibition in Hematological Malignancies.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently, various blood cell lineages expressing the PATIENTS: Multi-lineage
resultsAmong the 21 multi-Ph patients in our 59-patient cohort (36%),
conclusionWe confirmed that more than one-third of Ph+ALL patients could be classified as mutli-Ph. Although no specific molecular characteristics were identified for multi-Ph, this phenotype was associated with better treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.