Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33194680›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

A Deep Learning Model to Predict the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy by the Pretreatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Images of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Hai-Tao Zhu, Xiao-Yan Zhang, Yan-Jie Shi, Xiao-Ting Li, Ying-Shi Sun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Crying Need for a Better Response Assessment in Rectal Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hai-Tao ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Yan ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Yan-Jie ShiDepartment of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Ting LiDepartment of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Ying-Shi SunDepartment of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNPeking University Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePretreatment prediction of the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) helps to determine the subsequent plans for the patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). If the good responders (GR) and non-good responders (non-GR) can be accurately predicted, they can choose to intensify the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to decrease the risk of tumor progression during NCRT and increase the chance of organ preservation. Compared with radiomics methods, deep learning (DL) may adaptively extract features from the images without the need of feature definition. However, DL suffers from limited training samples and signal discrepancy among different scanners. This study aims to construct a DL model to predict GRs by training apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images from different scanners.

methodsThe study retrospectively recruited 700 participants, chronologically divided into a training group (n = 500) and a test group (n = 200). Deep convolutional neural networks were constructed to classify GRs and non-GRs. The networks were designed with a max-pooling layer parallelized by a center-cropping layer to extract features from both the macro and micro scale. ADC images and T2-weighted images were collected at 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla. The networks were trained by the image patches delineated by radiologists in ADC images and T2-weighted images, respectively. Pathological results were used as the ground truth. The deep learning models were evaluated on the test group and compared with the prediction by mean ADC value.

resultsArea under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) is 0.851 (95% CI: 0.789-0.914) for DL model with ADC images (DL_ADC), significantly larger (P = 0.018, Z = 2.367) than that of mean ADC with AUC = 0.723 (95% CI: 0.637-0.809). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of DL_ADC model are 94.3%, 68.3%, 87.4% and 83.7%, respectively. The DL model with T2-weighted images (DL_T2) produces an AUC of 0.721 (95% CI: 0.640-0.802), significantly (P = 0.000, Z = 3.554) lower than that of DL_ADC model.

conclusionDeep learning model reveals the potential of pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficient images for the prediction of good responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Indexed as

apparent diffusion coefficientdeep learninggood respondermagnetic resonance imagingrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID33194680
PMCPMC7658629
OpenAlexW3097109044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.