Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33194486›Full record

ReviewCureus2020

Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Cerebral Angiography.

Mohammad R Ghani, Vishal Busa, Ahmed Dardeir, Suganya Marudhai, Mauli Patel, Yousif M Abdelmoneim, Ahmad Jan, Noha Eskander

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05225636 (Stroke Process in FEmoral Versus Radial Access), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05225636 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Stroke Process in FEmoral Versus Radial Access

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteRan2021 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsIschemic Stroke, AcuteArmsthrombectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammad R GhaniNeurology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Vishal BusaInternal Medicine/Family Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Ahmed DardeirInternal Medicine/Family Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Suganya MarudhaiInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Mauli PatelInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Yousif M AbdelmoneimInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Ahmad JanSurgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Noha EskanderPsychiatry, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is the fourth leading cause of death in the United States and the primary reason for long-term disability. This debilitating condition can be divided into ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke. The former occurs in almost 90% of all cases and arises from the occlusion of the supplying artery. Over the years, the management of stroke has developed from solely medical treatment to that which combines medical with mechanical treatment. Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has drawn considerable interest in advanced medicine and is becoming more widely available. The two fundamental techniques in opening an occluded vessel are the transfemoral and transradial approaches. This literature review aims to compare the clinical implications, complication rate, and overall outcome between the transfemoral and transradial approaches in endovascular intervention in patients with acute ischemic stroke. We conducted a literature review on ischemic stroke and searched PubMed and Google Scholar for relevant articles published from January 2010 to March 2020. Mechanical thrombectomy has become the standard of care for patients with brain ischemia. The transradial approach exhibited superiority to the transfemoral route in resolving symptoms, decreased complication rates, and reduced healthcare costs in a subset of patients. In this literature review, the comparison between the two procedures reveals that the outcomes for anterior circulation stroke and posterior vascular system stroke may vary. Further research needs to be conducted to improve procedural skills and decrease technical difficulties, ultimately resulting in improved overall patient outcomes with respect to health and comfort.

Indexed as

acute ischemic strokecerebrovascular diseasemechanical thrombectomytransfemoral accesstransradial access

Identifiers

PMID33194486
PMCPMC7657371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.