ArticleGeriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation2020
Gait Training Using a Wearable Robotic Device for Non-Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Report.
Article in Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Powered single hip joint exoskeletons for gait rehabilitation: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Gait training using a wearable robotic hip device for incomplete spinal cord injury: A preliminary study.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2025Observational
- Article
- Rehabilitation Training after Spinal Cord Injury Affects Brain Structure and Function: From Mechanisms to Methods.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Gait Training after Stroke with a Wearable Robotic Device: A Case Report of Further Improvements in Walking Ability after a Recovery Plateau.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe aimed to report the clinical evaluation results of gait training with the Honda Walking Assist Device PATIENTS AND
methodsA 63-year-old male with SCI (grade D on the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale) underwent 20 HWAT sessions over 4 weeks. The self-selected walking speed (SWS), mean step length, cadence, 6-minute walking test (6MWT), Walking Index for SCI score, SCI Functional Ambulation Inventory gait score, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade, neurological level, upper and lower extremity motor scores, modified Ashworth Scale, Penn Spasm Frequency Scale, and Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III were measured on admission, at the start of HWAT, at 2 and 4 weeks post-HWAT, and at discharge. Three-dimensional kinematic gait analysis and electromyographic assessments were performed before and after HWAT.
resultsThe patient safely completed 20 HWAT sessions. We found improvements above the clinically meaningful difference in SWS and 6MWT as well as increased hip extension, ankle plantar- and dorsi-flexion range of motion and increased hip extensor, abductor, adductor, and ankle plantar flexor muscle activity. DISCUSSION: The SWS improved more markedly during the HWAT intervention, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (0.10 to 0.15 m/s) in walking speed for people with SCI until discharge. Moreover, the 6MWT results at 2 weeks after the start of HWAT exceeded the cutoff value (472.5 m) for community ambulation and remained at a similar value at discharge.
conclusionThe walking distance (6MWT) and the walking speed (SWS) both demonstrated clinically important improvements following 20 treatment sessions which included HWAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.