Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33194254›Full record

ArticleGeriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation2020

Gait Training Using a Wearable Robotic Device for Non-Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Report.

Kenichi Yoshikawa, Hirotaka Mutsuzaki, Kazunori Koseki, Yusuke Endo, Yuko Hashizume, Ryo Nakazawa, Toshiyuki Aoyama, Arito Yozu, Yutaka Kohno

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kenichi YoshikawaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9216-0057
Hirotaka MutsuzakiCenter for Medical Sciences, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan.
Kazunori KosekiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7864-8753
Yusuke EndoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Health Science University, Yamanashi, Japan.
Yuko HashizumeDepartment of Physical Therapy, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
Ryo NakazawaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
Toshiyuki AoyamaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan.
Arito YozuDepartment of Precision Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka KohnoCenter for Medical Sciences, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan.
Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe aimed to report the clinical evaluation results of gait training with the Honda Walking Assist Device PATIENTS AND

methodsA 63-year-old male with SCI (grade D on the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale) underwent 20 HWAT sessions over 4 weeks. The self-selected walking speed (SWS), mean step length, cadence, 6-minute walking test (6MWT), Walking Index for SCI score, SCI Functional Ambulation Inventory gait score, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade, neurological level, upper and lower extremity motor scores, modified Ashworth Scale, Penn Spasm Frequency Scale, and Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III were measured on admission, at the start of HWAT, at 2 and 4 weeks post-HWAT, and at discharge. Three-dimensional kinematic gait analysis and electromyographic assessments were performed before and after HWAT.

resultsThe patient safely completed 20 HWAT sessions. We found improvements above the clinically meaningful difference in SWS and 6MWT as well as increased hip extension, ankle plantar- and dorsi-flexion range of motion and increased hip extensor, abductor, adductor, and ankle plantar flexor muscle activity. DISCUSSION: The SWS improved more markedly during the HWAT intervention, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (0.10 to 0.15 m/s) in walking speed for people with SCI until discharge. Moreover, the 6MWT results at 2 weeks after the start of HWAT exceeded the cutoff value (472.5 m) for community ambulation and remained at a similar value at discharge.

conclusionThe walking distance (6MWT) and the walking speed (SWS) both demonstrated clinically important improvements following 20 treatment sessions which included HWAT.

Indexed as

Honda walking assist device®robot assisted gait trainingspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID33194254
PMCPMC7597562
OpenAlexW3096164762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.