Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33194189›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pain2020

Changes in peripheral and central sensitization in patients undergoing occipital nerve stimulation.

Theresa Wodehouse, Anish Bahra, Vivek Mehta

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pain, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06957873 (Evaluation of the Relationship Between Craniovertebral Angle and Fibromyalgia Symptom Severity), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06957873 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Relationship Between Craniovertebral Angle and Fibromyalgia Symptom Severity

TypeobservationalSponsorAnkara Training and Research HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled134ConditionsCraniovertebral Angle, Fibromyalgia Syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Update of Neuromodulation in Chronic Migraine.Current pain and headache reports · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Theresa WodehouseBarts Neuromodulation Unit & Pain and Anaesthesia Research Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1686-1230
Anish BahraBarts Neuromodulation Unit & Pain and Anaesthesia Research Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Vivek MehtaBarts Neuromodulation Unit & Pain and Anaesthesia Research Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
St Bartholomew's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCentral sensitization and impaired conditioned pain modulation (CPM) response have been reported to contribute to migraine progression. Migraine patients can present with allodynia possibly attributed to increased sensitivity of peripheral ends of nociceptors with both peripheral and central sensitization. Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) works by stimulating the distal branches of C1, C2 and C3 possibly altering the nociceptive traffic to the trigemino-cervical complex, brainstem and supranuclear connections.

aimsThis observational study explores peripheral and central sensitization in patients undergoing percutaneous ONS.

methodsFollowing local regulatory approval, 13 patients undergoing ONS with dual Octrode 90 cm leads and rechargeable implantable pulse generator (IPG) (St Jude) were recruited to have quantitative sensory testing (QST) pre- and post-procedure 2 weeks, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.

resultsPatients with intractable migraine demonstrated impaired CPM (mean baseline pressure pain thresholds (PPTs): 61.98 kPa vs 48.01 kPa cuff inflated) prior to ONS, reverting to an efficient CPM response within 2 weeks following ONS implant (68.9 kPa vs 104.5 kPa cuff inflated) and continuing positively over the next 12 months. In contrast, no statistical difference was observed in PPTs.

conclusionThis is the first reported observation highlighting the effects on central sensitization following ONS. A consistent and sustained improvement in CPM was observed in contrast to PPT's where there was no difference. Normalisation of the CPM response following ONS indicates that the treatment may reduce central sensitization in the migraine population.

Indexed as

Conditioned pain modulationmigraineoccipital nerve stimulationquantitative sensory testing

Identifiers

PMID33194189
PMCPMC7605059
OpenAlexW2965724245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.