ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020
A comparative study between Ki67 positive versus Ki67 negative females with breast cancer: Cross sectional study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The GAPP Aggressivity Score Correlates with Total Enriched Somatic Variant Burden in Sporadic Pheochromocytoma-A Pilot Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Evaluating the predictive value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and six diffusion models for prognostic factors in mass-type invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Perlecan (Heparan Sulphate Proteoglycan 2) Expression in Invasive Female Breast Carcinoma.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- Metallothionein expression in feline injection site fibrosarcomas.BMC veterinary research · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Model Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Better Predict the Preoperative Histological Grade of Breast Cancer Than a Radiomics Model.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe prognosis of breast cancer depends on several clinical and pathological parameters most importantly the clinical stage, other factors predicting the outcome are hormone receptors like estrogen and progesterone receptors. Expression of Ki67 also have been shown to affect the outcome. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 278 female patients diagnosed and operated for breast cancer. Patients were grouped into 2 groups according to the expression of Ki67 to those with positive and those with negative expression. Both groups were compared for differences.
resultsThe mean age was 48.61 years and the right breast was the commonest affected side, the mean tumor size was 34 mm, 70% had axillary LN involvement, 50% had intermediate tumor grade, and 85.6% had no recurrence. Most patients had stage IIA, IIB, and IIIA, 67.6% had positive expression of Ki67 and had a significant correlation with the tumor grade, tumor necrosis, and ER expression (P values 0.001, 0.047, and 0.002) respectively, while the correlation was negative with recurrence, axillary LN involvement, TNM stage, site of the tumor, age, tumor size, PR and HER-2 receptor (P values 0.476, 0.971, 0.509, 0.405, 0.122, 0.994, 0.892, and 0.418) respectively.
conclusionMost patients with breast cancer have positive expression of Ki67 which has a positive correlation with tumor grade, the presense of necrosis inside the tumor and estrogene receptor status. This marker is directly related with higher degrees of tumor agressiveness and may be useful in modulating different treatment modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.