ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2020
Validation of a Practical Forearm Supination Strength Measurement Technique in the Large Sample Cohort.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel Radiographic Indexes for Elbow Stability Assessment: Part A-Cadaveric Validation.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2021Article
- Novel Radiographic Indexes for Elbow Stability Assessment: Part B-Preliminary Clinical Study.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe strength of forearm in pronation and supination (P/S) is an important clinical assessment during pre-operative examination as well as in post-operative evaluation. Many clinical trials concerning the measurement of forearm P/S strength were performed using a dynamometer fixed on the wall. The aim of this study was to bring out a simple and reliable technique for the measurement of P/S strength using a dynamometer manually supported and stabilized by an examiner. We hypothesized that there are no differences in evaluation of elbow P/S strength using the dynamometer fixed or the dynamometer stabilized by an operator in healthy people.
methodsThe study was performed on a cross-sectional cohort of 100 healthy subjects without any history of injuries or previous surgery of the upper limbs. Isometric forearm P/S strengths were measured on the dominant and non-dominant forearms, using the dynamometer fixed on a table, and using the same dynamometer kept by an operator. The measurements were repeated in triplicate at 45°, 90° and 120° of elbow flexion in both upper limbs for all patients.
resultsA total of 100 subjects (50 females, 50 males) were included in the study group. The mean age was 46.5 years (range 25-52 years). Female and male subjects showed no significant differences concerning the mean age (F/M ratio 0.50/0.50). The mean body mass index of all participants was 24.34 ± 3.66 kg/m
conclusionThe manually stabilized technique is a valid and reliable technique to assess the P/S strength of the forearm. This is a simple and effective method that may be reproduced in our daily clinical practice as well as in sportive practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.