ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2020
Evaluation of the clinicopathologic features of diffuse large B cell lymphoma after CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy emphasizing the potential diagnostic pitfalls.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transdifferentiation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma to a poorly differentiated neoplasm following CAR T-cell therapy.Journal of hematopathology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinicopathologic data of 16 cases of DLBCL, NOS after CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical analyses were performed to investigate the diagnostic agreement and indicate the relationship of the given types or their alterations (Group I versus Group II) to the prognosis. A total of 5 distinct histologic patterns were summarized. The CAR T cells were somewhat atypical, most of which were CD8 positive in the most cases (86.7%, 13/15), with a relatively high Ki-67 (60-90%). The rearrangement of BCR was demonstrated in all cases. The diagnostic test showed that the diagnostic accuracy in cases of types III (7%) and V (7%) was typically low; the diagnostic agreement in cases of type IV (for B, T, or nonlymphoma) and V (for T, or nonlymphoma) was consistently unsatisfactory. The rates of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and progressive disease (PD) were 18.8% (3/16), 31.3% (5/16), 50% (8/16), respectively. In the follow-up, 25% (4/16) of cases experienced a recurrence and 31.3% (5/16) had died, of which 3 cases succumbed to the side effects. Group II had better disease-free survival (DFS,
Indexed as
Identifiers
33194070PMC7653563W3098711950What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.