Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33194055›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2020

Comparison of the efficacy and safety among apatinib plus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), apatinib plus conventional TACE and apatinib alone in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Yubin Hu, Mingzhi Hao, Qizhong Chen, Zhangxian Chen, Hailan Lin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05247996 (TACE Combined With "Target Immune" Therapy for First-line Treatment Compared With Intravenous Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05247996 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

TACE Combined With "Target Immune" Therapy for First-line Treatment Compared With Intravenous Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open, Real-World Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Central Hospital of Lishui CityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled98ConditionsIntrahepatic CholangiocarcinomaArmsTranscatheter arterial chemoembolization, Multi-target Drug Therapy, Immunocheckpoint Inhibitor Therapy, Systemic Intravenous Chemotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Conventional and drug‑eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization in patients with inoperable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a meta‑analysis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yubin HuDepartment of Tumor Interventional Radiology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital Fuzhou 350014, China.
Mingzhi HaoDepartment of Tumor Interventional Radiology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital Fuzhou 350014, China.
Qizhong ChenDepartment of Tumor Interventional Radiology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital Fuzhou 350014, China.
Zhangxian ChenDepartment of Tumor Interventional Radiology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital Fuzhou 350014, China.
Hailan LinDepartment of Tumor Interventional Radiology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital Fuzhou 350014, China.
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus drug-eluting bead (DEB) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), apatinib plus conventional TACE (cTACE) and apatinib alone in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients. We analyzed 35 advanced ICC patients retrospectively, including the apatinib plus DEB-TACE group (n=10), the apatinib plus cTACE group (n=12) and the apatinib group (n=13). Treatment response, survival data (including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) and adverse events were assessed during the follow-up. Both the objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) showed trends to be the highest in the apatinib plus DEB-TACE group (ORR: 84.6%/DCR: 100.0%), followed by the apatinib plus cTACE group (ORR: 75.0%/DCR: 91.7%) and then the apatinib group (ORR: 40.0%/DCR: 80.0%). PFS and OS were both the highest in the apatinib plus DEB-TACE group, followed by the apatinib plus cTACE group, and the shortest in the apatinib group, which was also confirmed by a multivariate Cox regression analysis. The incidences of adverse events were similar between the apatinib plus DEB-TACE group and the apatinib plus cTACE group but were higher in the apatinib plus DEB-TACE group and the apatinib plus cTACE than in the apatinib group; however, all of the adverse events were tolerable in the three groups. In conclusion, apatinib plus DEB-TACE is a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of advanced ICC.

Indexed as

adverse eventsapatinibconventional transarterial chemoembolizationdrug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolizationefficacyIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID33194055
PMCPMC7653562
OpenAlexW3101569952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.