ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2020
Porous fish collagen for cartilage tissue engineering.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Mechanisms of Chondrocyte Hypertrophy Mediated by Physical Cues and Therapeutic Strategies in Osteoarthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Marine Collagen from European Sea Bass (Marine drugs · 2025Article
- Fish-derived biomaterials for tissue engineering: advances in scaffold fabrication and applications in regenerative medicine and cancer therapy.Theranostics · 2025Review
- Effects of self-assembled type II collagen fibrils on the morphology and growth of pre-chondrogenic ATDC5 cells.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2024Article
- Fish By-Product Collagen Extraction Using Different Methods and Their Application.Marine drugs · 2024Review
- Review
- Cutting Edge Aquatic-Based Collagens in Tissue Engineering.Marine drugs · 2023Review
- Prokaryotic Collagen-Like Proteins as Novel Biomaterials.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Advanced Hydrogels for Cartilage Tissue Engineering: Recent Progress and Future Directions.Polymers · 2021Review
- Conductive Polymeric-Based Electroactive Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications: Current Progress and Challenges from Biomaterials and Manufacturing Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Biomaterial-Assisted Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Fish Waste: From Problem to Valuable Resource.Marine drugs · 2021Review
- Marine-Derived Collagen as Biomaterials for Human Health.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Review
- A Biomimetic Biphasic Scaffold Consisting of Decellularized Cartilage and Decalcified Bone Matrixes for Osteochondral Defect Repair.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Biological Evaluation of Acellular Cartilaginous and Dermal Matrixes as Tissue Engineering Scaffolds for Cartilage Regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cartilage defects repair is still a challenge in clinical practice until now. Although many breakthroughs have been achieved in cartilage repair using tissue engineering technology, there are still no scaffolds available for large-scale clinical applications. Currently, fish collagen (FC) is a natural source that is considered as an alternative to mammal-derived collagen in engineering cartilage tissue due to its excellent biocompatibility, suitable biodegradability, lack of immunogenicity, rich sources, low cost and minimal risk of transmitting zoonoses, which implies great potential for use in cartilage regeneration. Herein, we successfully prepared three-dimensional porous FC scaffolds from three different concentrations of FC (0.5%, 1% and 2%) by freeze-drying technology. Our results indicated that increasing the FC concentration resulted in comparable levels of suitable biodegradability and good biocompatibility but lead to a concurrent decrease in pore size and porosity and a significant increase in water absorption capacity and mechanical properties; further, initial scaffold dimension was only sustained in the 2% FC concentration. Moreover, the
Indexed as
Identifiers
33194017PMC7653596W3104517732What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.