Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33193923›Full record

ArticleCanadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC

Standards in medication review: An international perspective.

Olaf Rose, V-Lin Cheong, Sammu Dhaliwall, Karen Eislage, Susanne Erzkamp, Derek Jorgenson, Francisco Martínez, Karen Luetsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Assessment of Pharmacists' Willingness to Conduct Medication Use Reviews in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Ontario Pharmacy Evidence Network Atlas of MedsCheck services.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Pharmacist care planning services: What matters most.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olaf Roseimpac2t research (Rose), Muenster, Germany.
V-Lin Cheongimpac2t research (Rose), Muenster, Germany.
Sammu Dhaliwallimpac2t research (Rose), Muenster, Germany.
Karen Eislageimpac2t research (Rose), Muenster, Germany.
Susanne Erzkampimpac2t research (Rose), Muenster, Germany.
Derek Jorgensonimpac2t research (Rose), Muenster, Germany.
Francisco Martínezimpac2t research (Rose), Muenster, Germany.
Karen Luetschimpac2t research (Rose), Muenster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID33193923
PMCPMC7605065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.