Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33193826›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2020

Practical considerations in the use of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Fotios Loupakis, Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Jean-Baptiste Bachet, Feng-Che Kuan, Teresa Macarulla, Filippo Pietrantonio, Rui-Hua Xu, Hiroya Taniguchi, Thomas Winder, Satoshi Yuki and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

Fotios LoupakisUnit of Oncology 1, Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Lorenzo AntonuzzoMedical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Jean-Baptiste BachetSorbonne Université, Service d'hépato-gastro-entérologie, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière - Paris 6, APHP, Paris, France.
Feng-Che KuanDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Teresa MacarullaMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Filippo PietrantonioMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Rui-Hua XuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Hiroya TaniguchiDepartment of GI Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Thomas WinderDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Hematology and Oncology, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.
Satoshi YukiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Shan ZengDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Tanios Bekaii-SaabDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITChiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWHokkaido University Hospital · JPIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITLandeskrankenhaus Feldkirch · ATMayo Clinic Hospital · USNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPSorbonne Université · FRSun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Milan · ITVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ESXiangya Hospital Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved considerably, leading to increased overall survival and more patients eligible for third- or later-line therapy. Currently, two oral therapies are recommended in the third-line treatment of mCRC, regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil. Selecting the most appropriate treatment in the third-line setting poses different challenges compared with treatment selection at earlier stages. Therefore, it is important for physicians to understand and differentiate between available treatment options and to communicate the benefits and challenges of these to patients. In this narrative review, practical information on regorafenib is provided to aid physicians in their decision-making and patient communications in daily practice. We discuss the importance of appropriate patient selection and adverse events management through close patient monitoring and dose adjustments to ensure patients stay on treatment for longer and receive as much benefit as possible. We also highlight key physician-patient communication points to facilitate shared decision-making.

Indexed as

adverse eventsmetastatic colorectal cancerpractical managementregorafenibthird line

Identifiers

PMID33193826
PMCPMC7607787
OpenAlexW3096818271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.