ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020
Molecular Characterization and Clinical Relevance of RNA Binding Proteins in Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the Link Between Noncoding RNAs and Glycolysis in Colorectal Cancer.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Identification of New Prognostic Genes and Construction of a Prognostic Model for Lung Adenocarcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A double-edged sword: role of apoptosis repressor with caspase recruitment domain (ARC) in tumorigenesis and ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2023Review
- Development and validation of an RBP gene signature for prognosis prediction in colorectal cancer based on WGCNA.Hereditas · 2023Article
- Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay Factor Functions in Human Health and Disease.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- KLF16 promotes pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell proliferation and migration by positively regulating SMAD6.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Article
- RNA-binding proteins in ovarian cancer: a novel avenue of their roles in diagnosis and treatment.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Review
- The Prognostic and Molecular Landscape of Autophagy-Related Long Noncoding RNA in Colorectal Cancer.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Prognostic implications of ferroptosis-associated gene signature in colon adenocarcinoma.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Network analysis identifies DAPK3 as a potential biomarker for lymphatic invasion and colon adenocarcinoma prognosis.iScience · 2021Article
- Three-Dimensional Culture Models to Study Innate Anti-Tumor Immune Response: Advantages and Disadvantages.Cancers · 2021Review
- Construction and validation of an RNA-binding protein-associated prognostic model for colorectal cancer.PeerJ · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abnormal expression of RNA binding proteins (RBPs) has been reported across various cancers. However, the potential role of RBPs in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. In this study, we performed a systematic bioinformatics analysis of RBPs in CRC. We downloaded CRC data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Our analysis identified 242 differentially expressed RBPs between tumor and normal tissues, including 200 upregulated and 42 downregulated RBPs. Next, we found eight RBPs (RRS1, PABPC1L, TERT, SMAD6, UPF3B, RP9, NOL3, and PTRH1) related to the prognoses of CRC patients. Among these eight prognosis-related RBPs, four RBPs (NOL3, PTRH1, UPF3B, and SMAD6) were selected to construct a prognostic risk score model. Furthermore, our results indicated that the prognostic risk score model accurately predicted the prognosis of CRC patients [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)for 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and was 0.645 and 0.672, respectively]. Furthermore, we developed a nomogram based on a prognostic risk score model. The nomogram was able to demonstrate the wonderful performance in predicting 3- and 5-year OS. Additionally, we validated the clinical value of four risk genes in the prognostic risk score model and identified that these risk genes were associated with tumorigenesis, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, clinical stage, and prognosis. Finally, we used the TIMER and Human Protein Atlas (HPA)database to validate the expression of four risk genes at the transcriptional and translational levels, respectively, and used a clinical cohort to validate the roles of NOL3 and UPF3B in predicting the prognosis of CRC patients. In summary, our study demonstrated that RBPs have an effect on CRC tumor progression and might be potential prognostic biomarkers for CRC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.