ReviewFrontiers in genetics2020
The Modification of Circadian Clock Components in Soybean During Domestication and Improvement.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic diversity, population structure in a historical panel of Brazilian soybean cultivars.PloS one · 2025Article
- Flowering genes identification, network analysis, and database construction for 837 plants.Horticulture research · 2024Article
- MutantBreeding science · 2023Article
- Genetic Diversity of Korean Wild Soybean Core Collections and Genome-Wide Association Study for Days to Flowering.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Time of Day Analysis over a Field Grown Developmental Time Course in Rice.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Aschoff's rule on circadian rhythms orchestrated by blue light sensor CRY2 and clock component PRR9.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Core circadian clock and light signaling genes brought into genetic linkage across the green lineage.Plant physiology · 2022Article
- Cross-species transcriptomes reveal species-specific and shared molecular adaptations for plants development on iron-rich rocky outcrops soils.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Plant circadian clock control of Medicago truncatula nodulation via regulation of nodule cysteine-rich peptides.Journal of experimental botany · 2022Article
- The evolution and function of the PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR gene family in the plant circadian clock.Genetics and molecular biology · 2022Article
- A flowering time locus dependent onMolecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2021Article
- Circadian Rhythms in Legumes: What Do We Know and What Else Should We Explore?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agricultural production is greatly dependent on daylength, which is determined by latitude. Living organisms align their physiology to daylength through the circadian clock, which is made up of input sensors, core and peripheral clock components, and output. The light/dark cycle is the major input signal, moderated by temperature fluctuations and metabolic changes. The core clock in plants functions mainly through a number of transcription feedback loops. It is known that the circadian clock is not essential for survival. However, alterations in the clock components can lead to substantial changes in physiology. Thus, these clock components have become the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.