ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020
Multi-Indel: A Microhaplotype Marker Can Be Typed Using Capillary Electrophoresis Platforms.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developmental validation of a six-dye Multi-InDels kit for personal identification and paternity testing of highly degraded DNA samples.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Novel Microhaplotype Panel for DNA Mixture and Kinship Analysis.Electrophoresis · 2026Article
- Article
- Developmental validation of a novel all-in one assay of X chromosomal multi-insertion/deletion loci for forensic genetics.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Development of Omni InDel and supporting database for maize.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Recent advances in forensic biology and forensic DNA typing: INTERPOL review 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023Article
- An overview of SNP-SNP microhaplotypes in the 26 populations of the 1000 Genomes Project.International journal of legal medicine · 2022Article
- Typing of semen-containing mixtures using ARMS-based semen-specific CpG-InDel/STR markers.International journal of legal medicine · 2022Article
- Editorial: Forensic investigative genetic genealogy and fine-scale structure of human populations.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- A Novel SNP-STR System Based on a Capillary Electrophoresis Platform.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the concept of microhaplotypes was proposed by Kidd in 2013, various microhaplotype markers have been investigated for various forensic purposes, such as individual identification, deconvolution of DNA mixtures, or forensic ancestry inference. In our opinion, various compound markers are also regarded as generalized microhaplotypes, encompassing two or more variants in a short segment of DNA (e.g., 200 bp). That is, a set of variants (referred to herein as multi-variants) within a certain length includes single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), insertion/deletion polymorphisms (Indels), or short tandem repeat polymorphisms (STRs). At present, multi-variant is mainly aimed at multi-SNPs. However, the haplotype genotyping of multi-variants relies on single-strand analysis, mainly using massively parallel sequencing (MPS). Here, we describe a method based on a capillary electrophoresis (CE) platform that can directly obtain haplotypes of individuals. Several microhaplotypes consisting of three or more Indels with different insertion or deletion lengths in the range of less than 200 bp were screened out, each of which had at least three haplotypes. As a result, the haplotype of an individual was reflected by the length of its polymorphism. Finally, we established a multiplex amplification system containing 18 multi-Indel markers that could identify haplotypes on each chromosome of an individual. The combined power of discrimination (CPD) and the cumulative probability of exclusion (CPE) were 0.999999999997234 and 0.9984, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.