ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020
Preserving Microbial Community Integrity in Oilfield Produced Water.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Metagenomics and metatranscriptomics of prokaryotic and fungal microbiomes in produced water associated with petroleum degradation and pipeline corrosion from an oil terminal in Brazil.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Pilliga Ghosts: The Novel Fungi of the Rivers, Creeks, Lakes, and Dams of the Narrabri Region, Australia.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026Article
- Toward simulating offshore oilfield conditions: insights into microbiologically influenced corrosion from a dual anaerobic biofilm reactor.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Determining biocide efficacy for treating established sulfate-reducing biofilms using flow cell systems.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Examination of coal combustion management sites for microbiological and chemical signatures of groundwater impacts.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Phytoplankton ecology in the early years of a boreal oil sands end pit lake.Environmental microbiome · 2024Article
- Anaerobic hydrocarbon biodegradation by alkylotrophic methanogens in deep oil reservoirs.The ISME journal · 2024Article
- Impact of preservation method and storage period on ribosomal metabarcoding of marine microbes: Implications for remote automated samplings.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determining a representative microbial signature from any given location is dependent on robust sample collection and handling. Different sampling locations and hence sample properties can vary widely; for example, soil would be collected and handled differently compared to liquid samples. In the event that sample material has a low concentration of biomass, large quantities need to be collected for microbial community analysis. This is certainly the case when investigating the microbiology of oilfield systems, wherein produced water (PW) is one of the most common sources for microbial sampling. As the detrimental effects of microbial metabolism within these industrial milieus are becoming increasingly well-established, the characterization of microbial community composition using molecular biological analyses is becoming more commonplace for accurate monitoring. As this field continues to develop, the importance for standardized operating protocols cannot be understated, so that industry can make the most informed operational decisions possible. Accurately identifying oilfield microbial communities is paramount, as improper preservation and storage following sample collection is known to lead to erroneous microbial identifications. Preserving oilfield PW can be challenging, as many locations are remote, requiring lengthy periods of time before samples can be processed and analyzed. While previous studies have characterized the effects of various preservatives on concentrated, filtered, or purified microbial samples, to the best of our knowledge, no such study has been undertaken on low biomass liquid samples. To this end, we investigated the effectiveness of nine different preservation conditions on PW collected from the same sampling location within a heavy-oil producing field, and monitored how the microbial community changed over the period of a month. Our results reveal that the choice of preservative drastically affects microbial community, and should be selected with careful consideration before sampling occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.