Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33193037›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2020

Review of Autism Profiles and Response to Sertraline in Fragile X Syndrome-Associated Autism vs. Non-syndromic Autism; Next Steps for Targeted Treatment.

Akash Rajaratnam, Laura Axelrod Potter, Hazel Maridith Barlahan Biag, Andrea Schneider, Ignacio Cortina Petrasic, Randi Jenssen Hagerman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. State-of-the-art therapies for fragile X syndrome.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Targeted Treatments for Fragile X Syndrome.Advances in neurobiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Overlapping Molecular Pathways Leading to Autism Spectrum Disorders, Fragile X Syndrome, and Targeted Treatments.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akash RajaratnamMIND Institute, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Laura Axelrod PotterMIND Institute, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Hazel Maridith Barlahan BiagMIND Institute, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Andrea SchneiderMIND Institute, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Ignacio Cortina PetrasicMIND Institute, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Randi Jenssen HagermanMIND Institute, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Rodent Behavior CoreU54HD079125 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ABBEDUTO, LEONARD J. · 2013 to 2019
$8.5M
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD079125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given significant genetic, molecular, and phenotypic overlaps, researchers have begun to investigate whether targeted treatments for Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) could also be beneficial for patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). For example, low-dose sertraline, an SSRI, was used in two recent controlled trials in children with FXS and ASD. The first trial recruited 52 children with FXS, 32 of which were also diagnosed with ASD; the second trial recruited 58 children with non-syndromic ASD. One focus of the present study is to compare the response to sertraline between the FXS-associated ASD and non-syndromic ASD groups. Another focus is to compare baseline ASD-related characteristics between the groups and review these differences within the context of recent literature comparing these populations. Our comparison showed more severe ASD profiles in children with non-syndromic ASD vs. FXS-associated ASD. Regarding response to sertraline, the FXS-ASD group displayed significant improvements in language development, while the non-syndromic group did not show any significant improvements. One possible explanation for this differential response is the distinct anxiety profiles that are seen in these two groups. The heightened anxiety phenotype seen in those with FXS-ASD may have led to a greater relief of anxiety symptoms with sertraline compared to those with non-syndromic ASD; this, in turn, could have led to measurably greater developmental gains. Further research is required to solidify this connection between anxiety relief and developmental gains in these populations.

Indexed as

anxietyAutism spectrum disorder (ASD)Fragile X Syndromesertralinetargeted treatment

Identifiers

PMID33193037
PMCPMC7661746
OpenAlexW3095220231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.