SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2020
A Systematic Review of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Applications to Memory in Healthy Aging.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transcranial direct current stimulation for learning and memory in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of multisession frontoparietal network anodal tDCS and cognitive rehabilitation on subjective cognitive impairment: a double-blind RCT.BMC neurology · 2026Trial
- Microstructural and functional plasticity following repeated brain stimulation during cognitive training in older adults.Nature communications · 2023Trial
- tDCS improves early Alzheimer's disease by synaptic vesicle fusion and release.Military Medical Research · 2026Article
- Neuromodulation for restoring and amplifying brain function.Nature neuroscience · 2026Review
- Inter-Hemispheric Coordination and Ageing in Visual Working Memory: A Distributed Framework.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Dual-site theta stimulation modulates connectivity, but not sequence memory in older adults.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Review
- Effective Therapeutic Strategies to Prevent Frailty and Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.Aging and disease · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of Transcranial Stimulation on Cognitive Abilities of Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Opposite pattern of transcranial direct current stimulation effects in middle-aged and older adults: Behavioral and neurophysiological evidence.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- Therapeutic potential of brain stimulation techniques in the treatment of mental, psychiatric, and cognitive disorders.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2023Review
- Modulation of network centrality and gray matter microstructure using multi-session brain stimulation and memory training.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Leveraging technology to personalize cognitive enhancement methods in aging.Nature aging · 2022Article
- Randomized trial of cognitive training and brain stimulation in non-demented older adults.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2022Article
- Working Memory and Transcranial-Alternating Current Stimulation-State of the Art: Findings, Missing, and Challenges.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has long been acknowledged that memory changes over the course of one's life, irrespective of diseases like dementia. Approaches to mitigate these changes have however yielded mixed results. Brain stimulation has been identified as one novel approach of augmenting older adult's memory. Thus far, such approaches have however been nuanced, targeting different memory domains with different methodologies. This has produced an amalgam of research with an unclear image overall. This systematic review therefore aims to clarify this landscape, evaluating, and interpreting available research findings in a coherent manner. A systematic search of relevant literature was conducted across Medline, PsycInfo, Psycarticles and the Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, which uncovered 44 studies employing non-invasive electrical brain stimulation in healthy older adults. All studies were of generally good quality spanning numerous memory domains. Within these, evidence was found for non-invasive brain stimulation augmenting working, episodic, associative, semantic, and procedural memory, with the first three domains having the greatest evidence base. Key sites for stimulation included the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), temporoparietal region, and primary motor cortex, with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) holding the greatest literature base. Inconsistencies within the literature are highlighted and interpreted, however this discussion was constrained by potential confounding variables within the literature, a risk of bias, and challenges defining research aims and results. Non-invasive brain stimulation often did however have a positive and predictable impact on older adult's memory, and thus warrants further research to better understand these effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.