ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020
The Dialogue Between Two or More Brains: The "Hyperscanning" for Organization.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- From the lab to the real world: emotions serving morality in dyadic negotiation.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Frontal Delta Dissimilarity During Moral Persuasion: Insight from an EEG Hyperscanning Study.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Sensorimotor Simulation's Influence on Stress: EEG and Autonomic Responses in Digital Interviews.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- The neurosociological paradigm of the metaverse.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Envisioning translational hyperscanning: how applied neuroscience might improve family-centered care.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2023Article
- Shared emotions, interpersonal syntonization, and group decision-making: a multi-agent perspective.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Bringing social interaction at the core of organizational neuroscience.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- Article
- Human-Co-Bot Interaction and Neuroergonomics: Co-Botic vs. Robotic Systems.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.