Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33192896›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2020

Challenges and Future Directions of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Education.

Hui Luan, Peter Geczy, Hollis Lai, Janice Gobert, Stephen J H Yang, Hiroaki Ogata, Jacky Baltes, Rodrigo Guerra, Ping Li, Chin-Chung Tsai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic bibliographic analysis of heavy metal remediation.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hui LuanInstitute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Peter GeczyNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan.
Hollis LaiSchool of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Janice GobertGraduate School of Education, Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Stephen J H YangDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, National Central University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Hiroaki OgataGraduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Jacky BaltesDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Technology and Engineering, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Rodrigo GuerraCentro de Tecnologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.
Ping LiDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies, Faculty of Humanities, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Chin-Chung TsaiInstitute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We discuss the new challenges and directions facing the use of big data and artificial intelligence (AI) in education research, policy-making, and industry. In recent years, applications of big data and AI in education have made significant headways. This highlights a novel trend in leading-edge educational research. The convenience and embeddedness of data collection within educational technologies, paired with computational techniques have made the analyses of big data a reality. We are moving beyond proof-of-concept demonstrations and applications of techniques, and are beginning to see substantial adoption in many areas of education. The key research trends in the domains of big data and AI are associated with assessment, individualized learning, and precision education. Model-driven data analytics approaches will grow quickly to guide the development, interpretation, and validation of the algorithms. However, conclusions from educational analytics should, of course, be applied with caution. At the education policy level, the government should be devoted to supporting lifelong learning, offering teacher education programs, and protecting personal data. With regard to the education industry, reciprocal and mutually beneficial relationships should be developed in order to enhance academia-industry collaboration. Furthermore, it is important to make sure that technologies are guided by relevant theoretical frameworks and are empirically tested. Lastly, in this paper we advocate an in-depth dialog between supporters of "cold" technology and "warm" humanity so that it can lead to greater understanding among teachers and students about how technology, and specifically, the big data explosion and AI revolution can bring new opportunities (and challenges) that can be best leveraged for pedagogical practices and learning.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebig dataeducationlearningteaching

Identifiers

PMID33192896
PMCPMC7604529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.