Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33192837›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2020

Rapid Review and Meta-Meta-Analysis of Self-Guided Interventions to Address Anxiety, Depression, and Stress During COVID-19 Social Distancing.

Ronald Fischer, Tiago Bortolini, Johannes Alfons Karl, Marcelo Zilberberg, Kealagh Robinson, André Rabelo, Lucas Gemal, Daniel Wegerhoff, Thị Bảo Trâm Nguyễn, Briar Irving and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ronald FischerSchool of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Tiago BortoliniInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa & Ensino, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Johannes Alfons KarlSchool of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Marcelo ZilberbergTAL Education Group, Beijing, China.
Kealagh RobinsonSchool of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
André RabeloUniversidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Lucas GemalInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa & Ensino, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Daniel WegerhoffSchool of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Thị Bảo Trâm NguyễnSchool of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Briar IrvingSchool of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Megan ChrystalSchool of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Paulo MattosInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa & Ensino, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Victoria University of Wellington · NZD’Or Institute for Research and Education · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a rapid review and quantitative summary of meta-analyses that have examined interventions which can be used by individuals during quarantine and social distancing to manage anxiety, depression, stress, and subjective well-being. A literature search yielded 34 meta-analyses (total number of studies

Indexed as

anxietyCOVID-19culturedepressionmeta-analysisself-guided interventionsstresssubjective well-being

Identifiers

PMID33192837
PMCPMC7655981
OpenAlexW3097293400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.