Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33192812›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

Validation of the Tunisian Social Situation Instrument in the General Pediatric Population.

Olfa Rajhi, Soumeyya Halayem, Malek Ghazzai, Amal Taamallah, Mohamed Moussa, Zeineb Salma Abbes, Malek Hajri, Houda Ben Yahia, Maissa Touati, Radhouane Fakhfakh and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Olfa RajhiDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Razi Hospital, Manouba, Tunisia.
Soumeyya HalayemDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Razi Hospital, Manouba, Tunisia.
Malek GhazzaiDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Razi Hospital, Manouba, Tunisia.
Amal TaamallahDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Razi Hospital, Manouba, Tunisia.
Mohamed MoussaDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Razi Hospital, Manouba, Tunisia.
Zeineb Salma AbbesDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Razi Hospital, Manouba, Tunisia.
Malek HajriDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Razi Hospital, Manouba, Tunisia.
Houda Ben YahiaDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Razi Hospital, Manouba, Tunisia.
Maissa TouatiDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Razi Hospital, Manouba, Tunisia.
Radhouane FakhfakhFaculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Asma BoudenDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Razi Hospital, Manouba, Tunisia.
Faculté de médecine de TunisHôpital Razi de La Manouba · TNTunis University · TNTunis El Manar University · TN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to better understand the deployment of the theory of mind (ToM) in Tunisian neurotypical children, we have developed a new tool of assessment of the ToM called the "Tunisian Social Situations Instrument" (TSSI). We opted for the creation of this test in view of the intercultural differences in the development of social skills. Our purpose was to validate this tool in general pediatric population.

methodsIt was a cross-sectional evaluative study that aimed to validate the TSSI in the general pediatric population. We initially conducted a beta test and a pre-validation study before taking the initial version of the TSSI on 123 neurotypical children. Then, we followed the typical validation procedure: appearance validity, content validity, construct validity, and reliability study.

resultsRegarding the validity of appearance, the TSSI was comprehensible and adapted to the Tunisian pediatric population. About content validity, the exploratory factor analysis extracted 6 factors that explain 69.3% of the total variance. These factors were respectively social clumsiness types 1 and 2, intention attribution, emotional ToM, epistemic ToM, and simple comprehension questions. The subdomains of social clumsiness (types 1 and 2) and emotional ToM had a Cronbach alpha higher than 0.8. This factor structure as well as the significant inter-correlation between subdomains and the global score were in favor of a good construct validity. The internal consistency study showed good reliability of the final version of the TSSI (alpha of Cronbach at 0,809). Regarding the performance of children at the TSSI, we have noticed a significant association between the global score, age, and verbal intelligence.

conclusionThis work offers valuable insights about ToM and provides clinicians with a reliable tool to assess social clumsiness and emotional ToM in typically developing children.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disorderfactor analysissocial cognitiontheory of mindvalidation

Identifiers

PMID33192812
PMCPMC7658408
OpenAlexW3095366059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.