Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33192655›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2020

The French Integrative Psychosocial Rehabilitation Assessment for Complex Situations (FIPRACS): Modelization of an Adapted Assessment Method Toward Long-Term Psychiatric Inpatients With Disabling, Severe and Persistent Mental Illness.

Christophe Clesse, S Salime, I Dumand, S Barbier Concetta-Ciciarelli, S Lavenir, K Kacemi, P Heckel-Chalet, Frank Sissung, Aurore Poinsignon, Anthony Simon and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christophe ClesseCenter for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barth & The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
S SalimeLaboratoire INTERPSY (EA 4432), Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
I DumandCentre Hospitalier de Jury-les-Metz, Metz, France.
S Barbier Concetta-CiciarelliCentre Hospitalier de Jury-les-Metz, Metz, France.
S LavenirCentre Hospitalier de Jury-les-Metz, Metz, France.
K KacemiCentre Hospitalier de Jury-les-Metz, Metz, France.
P Heckel-ChaletCentre Hospitalier de Jury-les-Metz, Metz, France.
Frank SissungAssociation d'Information et d'Entraide Mosellane, Metz, France.
Aurore PoinsignonAssociation d'Information et d'Entraide Mosellane, Metz, France.
Anthony SimonLaboratoire INTERPSY (EA 4432), Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
M DeckerCentre Hospitalier de Jury-les-Metz, Metz, France.
M BattLaboratoire INTERPSY (EA 4432), Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the past forty years, the generalization of community-based approaches has prompted psychiatry into promoting a deinstitutionalization movement and a psychosocial rehabilitation approach (PSR) for individuals with schizophrenia and related difficulties. Unfortunately, this approach generally does not involve the most severe cognitive and psycho-affective clinical situations among this population despite an increasing number of publications advocating that all individuals should be included in PSR and deinstitutionalization programs. In this context, considering the absence of an assessment battery designed for French individuals with particularly disabling, severe, and persistent mental illness (IDSPMI), we constructed an integrative assessment model adapted to this specific population. To select the most suitable tools for this population, a literature review (inspired by the PRISMA protocol) and a systematic review were combined with a clinical assessment study. The literature review first identified the cognitive and psycho-affective functions which mainly influence the day-to-day life adaptation of individuals engaged in a PSR/deinstitutionalization program. The systematic review then gathered all of the useable French validated tools to assess the initially selected dimensions (n = 87). To finish, for each dimension, the selected 87 tools were included in a clinical assessment study performed within a French psychiatric hospital. The authors collected and verified the characteristics of each tool (validity, French norms, French version, the average speed of the test, ease of use, ability to assess other dimensions). Their suitability was also assessed when applied to IDSPMI. Based on this final clinical evaluation, the authors selected one tool per function to create the French Integrative Psychosocial Rehabilitation Assessment for Complex Situations (FIPRACS). This battery is an assessment tailored to the neurocognitive and psycho-affective potentials of IDSPMI. While further validation studies of this battery are ultimately required, the practical/clinical implications of this battery are presented and discussed.

Indexed as

anamnesischronic psychosisintegrative assessmentneuropsychological evaluationpsychological assessmentpsychosocial rehabilitation (PSR)rehabRorschach

Identifiers

PMID33192655
PMCPMC7531021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.