ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2020
On-board Training Strategy for IMU-Based Real-Time Locomotion Recognition of Transtibial Amputees With Robotic Prostheses.
Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Review on Locomotion Mode Recognition and Prediction When Using Active Orthoses and Exoskeletons.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Design and Bench Evaluation of a Sensor-Integrated Prosthetic-Leg Prototype.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Lower-limb prosthetic mechanisms: recent progress, control innovations and barriers to real-world adoption.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Review
- Active Rehabilitation Technologies for Post-Stroke Patients.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Lateral walking gait phase recognition for hip exoskeleton by denoising autoencoder-LSTM.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Lateral Walking Gait Recognition and Hip Angle Prediction Using a Dual-Task Learning Framework.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Recent trends and challenges of surface electromyography in prosthetic applications.Biomedical engineering letters · 2023Review
- Adapting Semi-Active Prostheses to Real-World Movements: Sensing and Controlling the Dynamic Mean Ankle Moment Arm with a Variable-Stiffness Foot on Ramps and Stairs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Noninvasive Human-Prosthesis Interfaces for Locomotion Intent Recognition: A Review.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The paper puts forward an on-board strategy for a training model and develops a real-time human locomotion mode recognition study based on a trained model utilizing two inertial measurement units (IMUs) of robotic transtibial prosthesis. Three transtibial amputees were recruited as subjects in this study to finish five locomotion modes (level ground walking, stair ascending, stair descending, ramp ascending, and ramp descending) with robotic prostheses. An interaction interface was designed to collect sensors' data and instruct to train model and recognition. In this study, the analysis of variance ratio (no more than 0.05) reflects the good repeatability of gait. The on-board training time for SVM (Support Vector Machines), QDA (Quadratic Discriminant Analysis), and LDA (Linear discriminant analysis) are 89, 25, and 10 s based on a 10,000 × 80 training data set, respectively. It costs about 13.4, 5.36, and 0.067 ms for SVM, QDA, and LDA for each recognition process. Taking the recognition accuracy of some previous studies and time consumption into consideration, we choose QDA for real-time recognition study. The real-time recognition accuracies are 97.19 ± 0.36% based on QDA, and we can achieve more than 95% recognition accuracy for each locomotion mode. The receiver operating characteristic also shows the good quality of QDA classifiers. This study provides a preliminary interaction design for human-machine prosthetics in future clinical application. This study just adopts two IMUs not multi-type sensors fusion to improve the integration and wearing convenience, and it maintains comparable recognition accuracy with multi-type sensors fusion at the same time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.