ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2020
Mapping the Scene and Object Processing Networks by Intracranial EEG.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- People, places, and things: The impact of scene animacy on emotional modulation of the early posterior negativity.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- The behavioral evidence of processing congruences and incongruences between Self- and Other-perspective-related representations during both perspective judgments.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Direct electrical stimulation of the human amygdala enhances recognition memory for objects but not scenes.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Brain-wide information flow dynamics during novel visual processing in humans.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Computational single-neuron mechanisms of visual object coding in the human temporal lobe.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Temporal order of activations and interactions during arithmetic calculations measured by intracranial electrophysiological recordings in the human brain.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Neural Dynamics of Visual Stream Interactions During Memory-Guided Actions Investigated by Intracranial EEG.Neuroscience bulletin · 2025Article
- Antagonistic behavior of brain networks mediated by low-frequency oscillations: electrophysiological dynamics during internal-external attention switching.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Preliminary Evidence for Global Properties in Human Listeners During Natural Auditory Scene Perception.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2024Article
- Electrical Source Imaging of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials from Intracranial EEG Signals.Brain topography · 2023Article
- Timing of Allocentric and Egocentric Spatial Processing in Human Intracranial EEG.Brain topography · 2023Article
- Tackling the challenges of group network inference from intracranial EEG data.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human perception and cognition are based predominantly on visual information processing. Much of the information regarding neuronal correlates of visual processing has been derived from functional imaging studies, which have identified a variety of brain areas contributing to visual analysis, recognition, and processing of objects and scenes. However, only two of these areas, namely the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and the lateral occipital complex (LOC), were verified and further characterized by intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG). iEEG is a unique measurement technique that samples a local neuronal population with high temporal and anatomical resolution. In the present study, we aimed to expand on previous reports and examine brain activity for selectivity of scenes and objects in the broadband high-gamma frequency range (50-150 Hz). We collected iEEG data from 27 epileptic patients while they watched a series of images, containing objects and scenes, and we identified 375 bipolar channels responding to at least one of these two categories. Using K-means clustering, we delineated their brain localization. In addition to the two areas described previously, we detected significant responses in two other scene-selective areas, not yet reported by any electrophysiological studies; namely the occipital place area (OPA) and the retrosplenial complex. Moreover, using iEEG we revealed a much broader network underlying visual processing than that described to date, using specialized functional imaging experimental designs. Here, we report the selective brain areas for scene processing include the posterior collateral sulcus and the anterior temporal region, which were already shown to be related to scene novelty and landmark naming. The object-selective responses appeared in the parietal, frontal, and temporal regions connected with tool use and object recognition. The temporal analyses specified the time course of the category selectivity through the dorsal and ventral visual streams. The receiver operating characteristic analyses identified the PPA and the fusiform portion of the LOC as being the most selective for scenes and objects, respectively. Our findings represent a valuable overview of visual processing selectivity for scenes and objects based on iEEG analyses and thus, contribute to a better understanding of visual processing in the human brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.