ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2020
Neuronal Activity at Synapse Resolution: Reporters and Effectors for Synaptic Neuroscience.
Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synaptic aging and neurodegeneration: the role of synaptic vesicle dynamics and neurotransmitter imbalance.Biogerontology · 2026Review
- Organic Phototransistor Photonic Synapses for Artificial Vision.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of Pioglitazone and Tirzepatide on Body Weight, Glucose Levels, Neuroinflammation, and Oxidative Stress in Diabetic Rats.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- Distinct spatial distribution of potentiated dendritic spines in encoding- and recall-activated hippocampal neurons.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025Article
- Beyond a Transmission Cable-New Technologies to Reveal the Richness in Axonal Electrophysiology.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Review
- Photoactivated Protein Degrader for Optical Control of Synaptic Function.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2023Article
- Dual Regulation of Spine-Specific and Synapse-to-Nucleus Signaling by PKCδ during Plasticity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- A Photoactivated Protein Degrader for Optical Control of Synaptic Function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Optogenetics at the presynapse.Nature neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of methods for the activity-dependent tagging of neurons enabled a new way to tackle the problem of engram identification at the cellular level, giving rise to groundbreaking findings in the field of memory studies. However, the resolution of activity-dependent tagging remains limited to the whole-cell level. Notably, events taking place at the synapse level play a critical role in the establishment of new memories, and strong experimental evidence shows that learning and synaptic plasticity are tightly linked. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the currently available techniques that enable to identify and track the neuronal activity with synaptic spatial resolution. We also present recent technologies that allow to selectively interfere with specific subsets of synapses. Lastly, we discuss how these technologies can be applied to the study of learning and memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.