Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33192232›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of health sciences

Use of ultraviolet-C in environmental sterilization in hospitals: A systematic review on efficacy and safety.

Clysly Celine R Ramos, Josemaria Lorenzo A Roque, Diane B Sarmiento, Luis Enrico G Suarez, Janela Tanya P Sunio, Kaezzy Ila B Tabungar, Geraldine Susan C Tengco, Phylis C Rio, Allan L Hilario

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of health sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clysly Celine R RamosDepartment of Biochemistry and Nutrition, College of Medicine, Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, Manila, Philippines.
Josemaria Lorenzo A RoqueDepartment of Biochemistry and Nutrition, College of Medicine, Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, Manila, Philippines.
Diane B SarmientoDepartment of Biochemistry and Nutrition, College of Medicine, Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, Manila, Philippines.
Luis Enrico G SuarezDepartment of Biochemistry and Nutrition, College of Medicine, Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, Manila, Philippines.
Janela Tanya P SunioDepartment of Biochemistry and Nutrition, College of Medicine, Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, Manila, Philippines.
Kaezzy Ila B TabungarDepartment of Biochemistry and Nutrition, College of Medicine, Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, Manila, Philippines.
Geraldine Susan C TengcoDepartment of Biochemistry and Nutrition, College of Medicine, Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, Manila, Philippines.
Phylis C RioDepartment of Biochemistry and Nutrition, College of Medicine, Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila, Manila, Philippines.
Allan L HilarioDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
University of the Philippines Manila · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe study aimed to review the literature on the use of ultraviolet-C (UV-C) sterilization to assess its clinical efficacy in reducing risk and transmission of nosocomial infections as well as its associated health safety or hazards.

methodsFour main search engines were used to identify potential studies which included: (1) Google Scholar, (2) ScienceDirect, (3) PubMed, and (4) Cochrane. Studies in English and published from 2010 to 2020 were considered. Studies on efficacy were limited to those in unseeded hospital environments, examining environmental disinfection, and with true experimental, randomized controlled trial, or quasi-experimental study designs. No additional criterion was used for safety studies due to the scarcity of literature. In the end, a total of 17 studies were selected. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Risk of bias assessment and manual data extraction and tabulation were done.

resultsTwelve eligible efficacy studies were identified together with five safety studies. It was found that UV-C irradiation had positive results when used as an adjunct for existing cleaning protocols. The germicidal effect of UV-C is potent against microorganisms including viruses, methicillin-resistant

conclusionIt was found that UV-C can be utilized as an adjunct to terminal manual cleaning because of its efficacy as a germicidal agent. Further studies must still be done to exact a standard for safe exposure dose, especially for 222 nm germicidal lamps. Direct evidence is needed for any targeted implementation of UV-C during Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Indexed as

coronavirus disease-19environmental sterilizationhospitalssystematic reviewUltraviolet-C

Identifiers

PMID33192232
PMCPMC7644456
OpenAlexW3100515353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.