Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33192110›Full record

ReviewClinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology2020

Carcinoid Heart Disease: How to Diagnose and Treat in 2020?

Barbara Bober, Marek Saracyn, Maciej Kołodziej, Łukasz Kowalski, Elżbieta Deptuła-Krawczyk, Waldemar Kapusta, Grzegorz Kamiński, Olga Mozenska, Jacek Bil

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Carcinoid Heart Disease.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Carcinoid Heart Disease.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Heart Failure in a Patient With Metastatic Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara BoberDepartment of Endocrinology and Isotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Mazowieckie, Poland.
Marek SaracynDepartment of Endocrinology and Isotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Mazowieckie, Poland.
Maciej KołodziejDepartment of Endocrinology and Isotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Mazowieckie, Poland.
Łukasz KowalskiDepartment of Endocrinology and Isotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Mazowieckie, Poland.
Elżbieta Deptuła-KrawczykDepartment of Endocrinology and Isotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Mazowieckie, Poland.
Waldemar KapustaDepartment of Endocrinology and Isotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Mazowieckie, Poland.
Grzegorz KamińskiDepartment of Endocrinology and Isotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Mazowieckie, Poland.
Olga MozenskaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hypertension and Vascular Diseases, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland.
Jacek BilDepartment of Invasive Cardiology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8724-5611
Wojskowy Instytut Medycyny Lotniczej · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLPostgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs, originally termed "carcinoids") create a relatively rare group of neoplasms with an approximate incidence rate of 2.5 to 5 cases per 100 000 persons. Roughly 30% to 40% of subjects with NETs develop carcinoid syndrome (CS), and 20% to 50% of subjects with CS are diagnosed with carcinoid heart disease (CaHD). The long-standing exposure to high serum serotonin concentration is one of the crucial factors in CaHD development. White plaque-like deposits on the endocardial surface of heart structures with valve leaflets and subvalvular apparatus thickening (fused and shortened chordae; thickened papillary muscles) are characteristic for CaHD. NT pro-BNP and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid are the 2 most useful screening markers. Long-acting somatostatin analogs are the standard of care in symptoms control. They are also the first-line treatment for tumor control in subjects with a metastatic somatostatin receptor avid disease. In cases refractory to somatostatin analogs, several options are available. We can increase a somatostatin analog to off-label doses, add telotristat ethyl or administer peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Cardiac surgery, which mainly involves valve replacement, is presently the most efficient strategy in subjects with advanced CaHD and can relieve unmanageable symptoms or be partly responsible for better prognosis.

Indexed as

carcinoid crisisHedinger’s syndromesomatostatin analogstricuspid valve replacementurinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid

Identifiers

PMID33192110
PMCPMC7597558
OpenAlexW3095514724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.