Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33192036›Full record

ArticleIEEE signal processing magazine2020

Compressed Sensing: From Research to Clinical Practice with Deep Neural Networks.

Christopher M Sandino, Joseph Y Cheng, Feiyu Chen, Morteza Mardani, John M Pauly, Shreyas S Vasanawala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE signal processing magazine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Advanced MRI techniques in abdominal imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. The "hidden noise" problem in MR image reconstruction.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christopher M SandinoDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305 USA.
Joseph Y ChengStanford University.
Feiyu ChenStanford University.
Morteza MardaniStanford University.
John M PaulyStanford University.
Shreyas S VasanawalaStanford University.

Funding

Rapid Robust Pediatric MRIR01EB009690 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LUSTIG, MICHAEL, VASANAWALA, SHREYAS S · 2010 to 2021
$5.6M
Development and Translation of High Performance Receive Arrays for Pediatric MRIR01EB019241 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PAULY, JOHN M., VASANAWALA, SHREYAS S · 2014 to 2018
$5.6M
Development and Validation of Radiation-Free Pediatric Renal Function QuantificationR01EB026136 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI VASANAWALA, SHREYAS S · 2018 to 2021
$2.7M
Predoctoral Training in Biomedical Imaging at Stanford UniversityT32EB009653 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BUTTS-PAULY, KIM · 2010 to 2019
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009690NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019241NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026136NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction methods leverage sparse structure in underlying signals to recover high-resolution images from highly undersampled measurements. When applied to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), CS has the potential to dramatically shorten MRI scan times, increase diagnostic value, and improve overall patient experience. However, CS has several shortcomings which limit its clinical translation such as: 1) artifacts arising from inaccurate sparse modelling assumptions, 2) extensive parameter tuning required for each clinical application, and 3) clinically infeasible reconstruction times. Recently, CS has been extended to incorporate deep neural networks as a way of learning complex image priors from historical exam data. Commonly referred to as unrolled neural networks, these techniques have proven to be a compelling and practical approach to address the challenges of sparse CS. In this tutorial, we will review the classical compressed sensing formulation and outline steps needed to transform this formulation into a deep learning-based reconstruction framework. Supplementary open source code in Python will be used to demonstrate this approach with open databases. Further, we will discuss considerations in applying unrolled neural networks in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

clinical translationcompressed sensingdeep learning

Identifiers

PMID33192036
PMCPMC7664163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.