Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33192005›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma

Articular disimpaction in acetabular fractures.

Srinivas Kasha, Ranjith Kumar Yalamanchili

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Reduction techniques for acetabular fractures].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Articular impactions in acetabular fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Srinivas KashaKrishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Ranjith Kumar YalamanchiliOrthopaedics, ESIC Medical College, Hyderabad, India.
Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acetabular impaction fractures when not adequately addressed leads to early arthritis. Dome impaction injuries and marginal impaction injuries have to be properly planned pre-operatively with respect to surgical approach, disimpaction techniques and fixation strategies. CT scan is the best modality to analyse the site, extent of impaction and plan strategies to reduce. Emphasis of early mobilisation should not drive the surgeon towards the motive of rigid fixation of columns alone, as the inadequate reduction of acetabular impaction leads to loss of mechanical support on weight bearing and thereby cause loss of reduction. Bone grafting either by auto or allograft or graft substitutes in the void after disimpaction helps in reducing anatomically and provide mechanical support adequately. In cases of severe comminution, reconstruction of the wall defect with autologous graft is a better treatment option. In this article we reviewed the characteristics of impaction injuries of acetabulum exploring surgical procedures, approaches and techniques for achieving open reduction and internal fixation.

Indexed as

Bone grafting in acetabular impaction fractureCranial marginal impaction fractureDome impaction fractureMarginal impaction fractureSea-gull sign

Identifiers

PMID33192005
PMCPMC7656478
OpenAlexW3087073815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.