Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33191763›Full record

SynthesisEuropean heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care2020

Risk stratification scores for patients with acute heart failure in the Emergency Department: A systematic review.

Òscar Miró, Xavier Rossello, Elke Platz, Josep Masip, Danielle M Gualandro, W Frank Peacock, Susanna Price, Louise Cullen, Salvatore DiSomma, Mucio Tavares de Oliveira and 9 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. MEESSI-AHF Score for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Vietnamese Acute Heart Failure.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Acute heart failure in non-cardiac surgery.European heart journal · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Òscar MiróEmergency Department, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier RosselloCardiology Department, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Spain.
Elke PlatzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, USA.
Josep MasipIntensive Care Department, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Danielle M GualandroDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.
W Frank PeacockHenry JN Taub Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, USA.
Susanna PriceRoyal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Imperial College, UK.
Louise CullenEmergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia.
Salvatore DiSommaRoyal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Imperial College, UK.
Mucio Tavares de OliveiraHeart Institute (INCOR), University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Brazil.
John Jv McMurrayEmergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia.
Francisco J Martín-SánchezDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Spain.
Alan S MaiselCoronary Care Unit and Heart Failure Program, Veteran Affairs (VA) San Diego, USA.
Christiaan VrintsAntwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Martin R CowieRoyal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Imperial College, UK.
Héctor BuenoCentro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Spain.
Alexandre MebazaaUniversity Paris Diderot, France.
Christian MuellerDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.
Study Group on Acute Heart Failure of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association of the European Society of Cardiology

Funding

Utility of Lung Ultrasound in Assessing Pulmonary Congestion in Heart FailureK23HL123533 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI PLATZ, ELKE · 2015 to 2019
$881k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL123533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study aimed to systematically identify and summarise all risk scores evaluated in the emergency department setting to stratify acute heart failure patients. METHODS AND

resultsA systematic review of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted including all multicentre studies reporting the use of risk predictive models in emergency department acute heart failure patients. Exclusion criteria were: (a) non-original articles; (b) prognostic models without predictive purposes; and (c) risk models without consecutive patient inclusion or exclusively tested in patients admitted to a hospital ward. We identified 28 studies reporting findings on 19 scores: 13 were originally derived in the emergency department (eight exclusively using acute heart failure patients), and six in emergency department and hospitalised patients. The outcome most frequently predicted was 30-day mortality. The performance of the scores tended to be higher for outcomes occurring closer to the index acute heart failure event. The eight scores developed using acute heart failure patients only in the emergency department contained between 4-13 predictors (age, oxygen saturation and creatinine/urea included in six scores). Five scores (Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade, Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade 30 Day mortality ST depression, Epidemiology of Acute Heart Failure in Emergency department 3 Day, Acute Heart Failure Risk Score, and Multiple Estimation of risk based on Emergency department Spanish Score In patients with Acute Heart Failure) have been externally validated in the same country, and two (Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade and Multiple Estimation of risk based on Emergency department Spanish Score In patients with Acute Heart Failure) further internationally validated. The c-statistic for Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade to predict seven-day mortality was between 0.74-0.81 and for Multiple Estimation of risk based on Emergency department Spanish Score In patients with Acute Heart Failure to predict 30-day mortality was 0.80-0.84.

conclusionsThere are several scales for risk stratification of emergency department acute heart failure patients. Two of them are accurate, have been adequately validated and may be useful in clinical decision-making in the emergency department i.e. about whether to admit or discharge.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementRegistriesAcute DiseaseEmergency Service, HospitalHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAcute heart failureemergency departmentrisk scoressystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33191763
PMCPMC7886282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.