Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33191473›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2020

Multiple and independent rearrangements revealed by comparative cytogenetic mapping in the dysploid Leptostachyus group (Phaseolus L., Leguminosae).

Maria Eduarda Ferraz, Artur Fonsêca, Andrea Pedrosa-Harand

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Comparative analysis of repetitive DNA in dysploid and non-dysploid Phaseolus beans.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Mixed-Ploidy and Dysploidy inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Molecular and Cytogenetic Analysis of rDNA Evolution in Crepis Sensu Lato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Oligo-FISH barcode in beans: a new chromosome identification system.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Eduarda FerrazLaboratório de Citogenética e Evolução Vegetal, Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, R. Prof. Moraes Rego, s/n, CDU, Recife, PE, 50670-420, Brazil.
Artur FonsêcaLaboratório de Citogenética e Evolução Vegetal, Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, R. Prof. Moraes Rego, s/n, CDU, Recife, PE, 50670-420, Brazil.
Andrea Pedrosa-HarandLaboratório de Citogenética e Evolução Vegetal, Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, R. Prof. Moraes Rego, s/n, CDU, Recife, PE, 50670-420, Brazil. andrea.harand@ufpe.br.ORCID 0000-0001-5213-4770
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyploidy and dysploidy have been reported as the main events in karyotype evolution of plants. In the genus Phaseolus L. (2n = 22), a small monophyletic group of three species, the Leptostachyus group, presents a dysploid karyotype with 2n = 20. It was shown in Phaseolus leptostachyus that the dysploidy was caused by a nested chromosome fusion (NCF) accompanied by several translocations, suggesting a high rate of karyotype evolution in the group. To verify if this karyotype restructuring was a single event or occurred progressively during the evolution of this group, we analysed P. macvaughii, sister to Phaseolus micranthus + P. leptostachyus. Twenty-four genomic clones of P. vulgaris previously mapped on P. leptostachyus, in addition to the 5S and 35S rDNA probes, were used for fluorescence in situ hybridization. Only a single rearrangement was common to the two species: the nested chromosome fusion (NCF) involving chromosomes 10 and 11. The translocation of chromosome 2 is not the same found in P. leptostachyus, and pericentric inversions in chromosomed 3 and 4 were exclusive of P. macvaughii. The other rearrangements observed in P. leptostachyus were not shared with this species, suggesting that they occurred after the separation of these lineages. The presence of private rearrangements indicates a progressive accumulation of karyotype changes in the Leptostachyus group instead of an instant genome-wide repatterning.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsChromosome MappingCytogeneticsGene RearrangementEvolution, MolecularGenome, PlantIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMitosisPhaseolusTranslocation, GeneticBAC-FISHDysploidyInversionKaryotype evolutionNested chromosome fusionTranslocation

Identifiers

PMID33191473
OpenAlexW3104759158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.