Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33191248›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Work-based risk factors and quality of life in health care workers providing maternal and newborn care during the Sierra Leone Ebola epidemic: findings using the WHOQOL-BREF and HSE Management Standards Tool.

Susan Jones, Sarah White, Judith Ormrod, Betty Sam, Florence Bull, Steven Pieh, Somasundari Gopalakrishnan, Nynke van den Broek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impact of COVID-19 on the Quality of Life of Households in Saudi Arabia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan JonesSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK S.Jones@hud.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0883-4627
Sarah WhiteCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5535-8075
Judith OrmrodSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Betty SamCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Florence BullCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Steven PiehCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Somasundari GopalakrishnanCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Nynke van den BroekCentre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Huddersfield · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBefore the 2014, Ebola epidemic in Sierra Leone, healthcare workers (HCWs) faced many challenges. Workload and personal risk of HCWs increased but their experiences of these have not been well explored. HCWs evaluation of their quality of life (QoL) and risk factors for developing work-based stress is important in helping to develop a strong and committed workforce in a resilient health system.

methodsCross-sectional study using World Health Organisation Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF and Health and Safety Executive (HSE) Standards Tools in 13 Emergency Obstetric Care facilities to (1) understand the perceptions of HCWs regarding workplace risk factors for developing stress, (2) evaluate HCWs perceptions of QoL and links to risk factors for workplace stress and (3) assess changes in QoL and risk factors for stress after a stress management programme.

results222 completed the survey at baseline and 156 at follow-up. At baseline, QoL of HCWs was below international standards in all domains. There was a significant decrease in score for physical health and psychological well-being (mean decrease (95% CI); 2.3 (0.5-4.1) and 2.3 (0.4-4.1)). Lower cadres had significant decreases in scores for physical health and social relationships (13.0 (3.6-22.4) and 14.4 (2.6-26.2)). On HSE peer-support and role understanding scored highly (mean scores 4.0 and 3.7 on HSE), workplace demands were average or high-risk factors (mean score 3.0). There was a significant score reduction in the domains relationships and understanding of role (mean score reduction (95% CI) 0.16 (0.01-0.31) and 0.11 (0.01-0.21)), particularly among lower cadres (0.83 (0.3-1.4).

conclusionHCWs in low-resourced settings may have increased risk factors for developing workplace stress with low QoL indicators; further exploration of this is needed to support staff and develop their contribution to the development of resilient health systems.

Indexed as

EpidemicsHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyQuality of LifeReference StandardsRisk FactorsSierra LeoneSurveys and QuestionnairesWorld Health Organizationebola virushealth care serviceshuman resource managementquality of lifework place stress

Identifiers

PMID33191248
PMCPMC7668354
OpenAlexW3104253821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.