Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33190646›Full record

ArticleParasitology2021

Diagnostic comparison of stool exam and point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA) test for schistosomiasis mansoni diagnosis in a high endemicity area in northeastern Brazil.

Danielle de Freitas Bezerra, Marta Cristhiany Cunha Pinheiro, Luciene Barbosa, Agostinho Gonçalves Viana, Ricardo Toshio Fujiwara, Fernando Schemelzer de Moraes Bezerra

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle de Freitas BezerraPost-Graduate Program in Pathology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Marta Cristhiany Cunha PinheiroLaboratory of Parasitology and Mollusc Biology, Department of Clinical Analysis and Toxicology, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Luciene BarbosaParasitology and Tropical Entomology Laboratory, Department of Morphology, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracajú, Brazil.
Agostinho Gonçalves VianaInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ricardo Toshio FujiwaraInstitute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Fernando Schemelzer de Moraes BezerraPost-Graduate Program in Pathology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4920-7718
Universidade Federal do Ceará · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de Sergipe · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (POC-CCA) test in a highly endemic area in Brazil, comparing it to the Kato-Katz (KK) technique for sensitivity, specificity and the intensity of the reaction of the test in relation to the parasitic load. The community in Sergipe, Brazil, participated in the study, providing three stool samples, one of urine (POC-CCA) and fingers tick blood sample was tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, kappa coefficient and Spearman's correlation were calculated for the POC-CCA test using the KK as the reference. The prevalence of schistosomiasis by KK testing was 48.82%; POC-CCA (t+) 66.14%; POC-CCA (t-) 45.24%. ELISA results showed 100% agreement in individuals with high and moderate eggs per gram (EPG). POC-CCA presented good diagnostic performance in individuals with medium and high EPG, but there were a high number of false negatives in individuals with low intensity infections. As observed, POC-CCA-filter test improves accuracy and sensitivity compared to a conventional test.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnimalsAntigens, HelminthBrazilChildChild, PreschoolEndemic DiseasesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPoint-of-Care TestingPrevalenceAntigens, HelminthDiagnosishigh endemicityimmunochromatographyKato-KatzPOC-CCASchistosoma mansoni

Identifiers

PMID33190646
PMCPMC11010182
OpenAlexW3099784544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.