Exploring the Dimensionality of the Social Skills Improvement System Using Exploratory Graph Analysis and Bifactor-(

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Social Skills Improvement System Autism Spectrum Scale.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025
   Article
2. An examination of the Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scale (SSIS-RS) teacher and parent forms factor structure in a sample of Mexican American preschool-aged children.PloS one · 2025
   Article
3. Translation and validation of the Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-SWB32 assessing the spiritual wellbeing of women with gynecological cancer.PloS one · 2025
   Article
4. Utility of the social skills improvement system-rating scales for capturing dynamic social constructs: Evidence using the measurement model of derivatives.Child development
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as