Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33190383›Full record

ReviewCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2021

Modifying Regulatory Practices to Create a Safe and Effective Working Environment Within a Shared Resource Laboratory During a Global Pandemic.

Andrew Filby, David L Haviland, Derek D Jones, Andrea Bedoya López, Eva Orlowski-Oliver, Aja M Rieger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Solutions for Shared Resource Lab Remote Quality Control and Instrument Troubleshooting during a Pandemic.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2021
    Review
  2. Biosafety during a pandemic: shared resource laboratories rise to the challenge.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew FilbyInnovation, Methodology and Application Research Theme, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9078-4360
David L HavilandFlow Cytometry Core, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA.
Derek D JonesDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Andrea Bedoya LópezNational Laboratory of Flow Cytometry, Department of Immunology, Biomedical Research Institute, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Eva Orlowski-OliverAMREP Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Burnet Institute, Australia.
Aja M RiegerDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

PandemicsPhysical DistancingCOVID-19Guidelines as TopicHumansOccupational ExposurePersonal Protective EquipmentTeleworkingCore Scientific FacilitiesCOVID-19regulatory guidelinesSARS-CoV-2SRL operations

Identifiers

PMID33190383
PMCPMC7753821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.