Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33190138›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic research2021

Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics, and Visual Outcomes of Patients with Intraocular Foreign Bodies in Southwest China: A 10-Year Review.

Tiancong Chang, Yun Zhang, Ling Liu, Keren Zhang, Xinyu Zhang, Miao Wang, Yue Zeng, Meixia Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Value of Ocular Endoscopy in Extraction of Intraocular Foreign Bodies of Cilia in Patients with Open Ocular Trauma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tiancong ChangMacular Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yun ZhangMacular Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ling LiuMacular Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Keren ZhangMacular Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xinyu ZhangMacular Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Miao WangMacular Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yue ZengMacular Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Meixia ZhangMacular Disease Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) are a serious subset of open-globe injury that can result in visual loss. This study analyzed the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and visual outcomes of patients with IOFBs in Southwest China.

methodsThis retrospective study comprised 1,176 patients with the primary diagnosis of IOFBs who resided in Sichuan Province over a 10-year period. All data were collected from medical records and analyzed statistically.

resultsThe annual incidence for IOFBs was 0.14 per 100,000 (95% confidence interval 0.12-0.16 per 100,000) people in Southwest China. In that period, IOFBs accounted for 22.3% of all open-globe injuries. Working-age male patients accounted for 79.1% of all IOFBs patients and there had significant differences in age distributions between genders (p < 0.001). Metallic IOFBs were the most common (74.6%) IOFB, but there were significant differences in the materials of IOFBs between adults and children of different age-groups (p < 0.001). At discharge, 277 (23.6%) patients had increased visual acuity (VA) and 95 (8.0%) had no light perception. Initial VA <20/200 (odds ratio [OR], 5.5; p < 0.001), increasing wound size (OR, 1.3; p = 0.004), IOFBs in the posterior segment (OR, 2.6; p = 0.002) and existing complications (traumatic cataract, endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, or retinal break) were independent risk factors for final VA <20/200.

conclusionThe incidence of IOFBs in Southwest China differed from global statistics. Adults and children had different clinical characteristics. Thus, their prevention strategies should be different.

Indexed as

Eye Foreign BodiesEye Injuries, PenetratingFemaleHumansMalePrognosisRetinal DetachmentRetrospective StudiesEpidemiologyIntraocular foreign bodiesSouthwest China

Identifiers

PMID33190138
PMCPMC8259062
OpenAlexW3101363420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.