Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33189929›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2021

Callosal anisotropy predicts attentional network changes after parietal inhibitory stimulation.

Selene Schintu, Catherine A Cunningham, Michael Freedberg, Paul Taylor, Stephen J Gotts, Sarah Shomstein, Eric M Wassermann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Selene SchintuNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, USA; Department of Psychology, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA. Electronic address: selene.schintu@gmail.com.
Catherine A CunninghamNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, USA.
Michael FreedbergNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, USA.
Paul TaylorNational Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, USA.
Stephen J GottsNational Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, USA.
Sarah ShomsteinDepartment of Psychology, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.
Eric M WassermannNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, USA.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USGeorge Washington University · USNational Institute of Mental Health · US

Funding

Scientific and Statistical Computing CoreZICMH002888 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI TAYLOR, PAUL · 2009 to 2025
$30.9M
Electrophysiological Probes And Treatments In Neurobehavioral DisordersZIANS002977 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI WASSERMANN, ERIC M · 2009 to 2025
$14.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 NS999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NS002977Intramural NIH HHS ZIC MH002888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemispatial neglect is thought to result from disruption of interhemispheric equilibrium. Right hemisphere lesions deactivate the right frontoparietal network and hyperactivate the left via release from interhemispheric inhibition. Support for this putative mechanism comes from neuropsychological evidence as well as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies in healthy subjects, in whom right posterior parietal cortex (PPC) inhibition causes neglect-like, rightward, visuospatial bias. Concurrent TMS and fMRI after right PPC TMS show task-dependent changes but may fail to identify effects of stimulation in areas not directly activated by the specific task, complicating interpretations. We used resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) after inhibitory TMS over the right PPC to examine changes in the networks underlying visuospatial attention and used diffusion-weighted imaging to measure the structural properties of relevant white matter pathways. In a crossover experiment in healthy individuals, we delivered continuous theta burst TMS to the right PPC and vertex as control condition. We hypothesized that PPC inhibitory stimulation would result in a rightward visuospatial bias, decrease frontoparietal RSFC, and increase the PPC RSFC with the attentional network in the left hemisphere. We also expected that individual differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) of the frontoparietal network and the callosal pathway between the PPCs would account for variability of the TMS-induced RSFC changes. As hypothesized, TMS over the right PPC caused a rightward shift in line bisection judgment and increased RSFC between the right PPC and the left superior temporal gyrus. This effect was inversely related to FA in the posterior corpus callosum. Local inhibition of the right PPC reshapes connectivity in the attentional network and depends significantly on interhemispheric connections.

Indexed as

AdultAnisotropyAttentionBrain MappingCorpus CallosumFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetPerceptual DisordersPhotic StimulationSpace PerceptionTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultDTIfMRINeglectParietal cortexResting state functional connectivityTMSVisuospatial attention

Identifiers

PMID33189929
PMCPMC7885523
OpenAlexW3103474139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.