Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33189832›Full record

ReviewBiochimie2021

The key role of Warburg effect in SARS-CoV-2 replication and associated inflammatory response.

Philippe Icard, Hubert Lincet, Zherui Wu, Antoine Coquerel, Patricia Forgez, Marco Alifano, Ludovic Fournel

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Philippe IcardUniversité Caen Normandie, Medical School, CHU de Caen, Caen, F-14000, France; Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, Inserm U1086 Interdisciplinary Research Unit for Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Service de Chirurgie Thoracique, Hôpital Cochin, Paris University Hospitals, APHP, France. Electronic address: philippe.icard@aphp.fr.
Hubert LincetINSERM U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon (CRCL), France; ISPB, Faculté de Pharmacie, Lyon, France, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Zherui WuINSERM U1224, Cellular Homeostasis and Cancer, Paris University, Paris, France; School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Antoine CoquerelINSERM U1075, COMETE, Université Caen Normandie, France.
Patricia ForgezINSERM U1224, Cellular Homeostasis and Cancer, Paris University, Paris, France.
Marco AlifanoService de Chirurgie Thoracique, Hôpital Cochin, Paris University Hospitals, APHP, France; INSERM U1138, Integrative Cancer Immunology, Paris, France.
Ludovic FournelService de Chirurgie Thoracique, Hôpital Cochin, Paris University Hospitals, APHP, France; INSERM U1224, Cellular Homeostasis and Cancer, Paris University, Paris, France.
Inserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current mortality due to the Covid-19 pandemic (approximately 1.2 million by November 2020) demonstrates the lack of an effective treatment. As replication of many viruses - including MERS-CoV - is supported by enhanced aerobic glycolysis, we hypothesized that SARS-CoV-2 replication in host cells (especially airway cells) is reliant upon altered glucose metabolism. This metabolism is similar to the Warburg effect well studied in cancer. Counteracting two main pathways (PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK signaling) sustaining aerobic glycolysis inhibits MERS-CoV replication and thus, very likely that of SARS-CoV-2, which shares many similarities with MERS-CoV. The Warburg effect appears to be involved in several steps of COVID-19 infection. Once induced by hypoxia, the Warburg effect becomes active in lung endothelial cells, particularly in the presence of atherosclerosis, thereby promoting vasoconstriction and micro thrombosis. Aerobic glycolysis also supports activation of pro-inflammatory cells such as neutrophils and M1 macrophages. As the anti-inflammatory response and reparative process is performed by M2 macrophages reliant on oxidative metabolism, we speculated that the switch to oxidative metabolism in M2 macrophages would not occur at the appropriate time due to an uncontrolled pro-inflammatory cascade. Aging, mitochondrial senescence and enzyme dysfunction, AMPK downregulation and p53 inactivation could all play a role in this key biochemical event. Understanding the role of the Warburg effect in COVID-19 can be essential to developing molecules reducing infectivity, arresting endothelial cells activation and the pro-inflammatory cascade.

Indexed as

InflammationCOVID-19GlycolysisHumansMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusSARS-CoV-2Virus ReplicationAMPKAtherosclerosisMacrophageSARS-CoV-2Warburg effect

Identifiers

PMID33189832
PMCPMC7659517
OpenAlexW3101349509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.